IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sun, 30 May 2021 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178703A3BAF for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qIT-5YGwVS6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED46B3A3BAD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 131so11349261ljj.3 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tZYroB30TXsgFUUMt2SngZ8M8X1DI7tXmKftdxCP4nI=; b=VhoI7yG0sQ2SJqGuNXB2xcrubljL6Kb2+DKLtfiTPJU32tJk7jUQOlEeHqAIFhkmxe yDJIKhoKSeNnIzd2zuqC5XTL8nZhuiOT9W9U+hRiKuscmYvn58f4xFgKhWcqbwzWDTZC 3XqxjRLyODmFUBfPHqCtYpu+0/yIWxuNxPbAbw53/3wr5rYeOdph2yFMsCrK455SIU0L I2Qi1wi3VUDKtHSMHWbm3SswTa2UGi472IAxXcYfrn/ygBPgEpAotLc1J4+DR2Qf4+Lj yIbAG9SReIc3arKFS9mK0qVXEixWFvcHKbifhiFIqrO+sYCQ1/3rDvF63j/ohVZ8sG6T ZHQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tZYroB30TXsgFUUMt2SngZ8M8X1DI7tXmKftdxCP4nI=; b=QwT/D2qUqP87bOHsAAbZzdwsTHip5ejw4jL9n87fE68RkNUTkqqWKUV05gWn20kSRH LgUtQRZjJ2dYoXvXSQKK0IiFODMIgncnBidZS+U/ENndbbJGWV0Se5DQBDwlszUvInw3 DgDUO77CXC7nS9nA2dLepaZnkFsxEJ1PPKZOZ2EWCf5e//QGugkYabOqxLDSGH/16wqJ bxZtL98345CXdYghUqjPFNsjCLlq5n6U/1qSj+32ViUrBOPDk9GoglpLJb6ABGTT4S4C 1TXkmthI67Z7/syPF+zNcsgZEsL9eaYMI0uUEpdm0uswtE8OxvTuBDqUbpZIHNLCiOOi It2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531k1DAtCLxHEFq2fgb+cUEdU8+zJGTXJ66razrePmNCm022cU2z 0O4cQ/P60TtNxH7adMeF2DIsXKPSAiLXgwYVqe8fmSMSaIe20g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgFqWDRysY8Ak+Z/xnziw8LLo0ucN/VRzku9w9T/EwxSRCMYoYqODC15DKUgBvEf5+aTqlgVR4xaKYeB+7DQ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5342:: with SMTP id t2mr13200973ljd.321.1622379555866; Sun, 30 May 2021 05:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <m2wnrlcitn.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2wnrlcitn.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 14:59:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEOPyUhQ0p_a+3+Bw=NVJwx=aDMm7-NzOaByBxE3kG5ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e5eab05c38badbe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/6RmVvQOQhWO9AetKkiP_X7LgKDU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 12:59:24 -0000

Hi,

I support WG adoption of this draft.

It seems clear to me that protection for any constrained topology should
use/prefer same constrains if available (with possible fallback to base if
operator wishes so).

Flexible algorithm based topologies should be no exception to this.

And as a side note if using flexible algorithm solves real problems even if
the same problems could be solved with MTR to me this is a feature not a
bug to use simpler technology to accomplish the goal(s).

Cheers,
R.

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 10:59 PM Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:

>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid/
>
> Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021
>
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of
> any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee and Chris.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email