Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Wed, 02 June 2021 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA343A34FB for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=c7ctpGlW; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=DNqDSoCw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSFO61M83s_Q for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:03:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84D53A34FA for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2205; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1622610228; x=1623819828; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=c/qluBmJfE4HtfYlxiWda7kwpMY3a3+a55HFZrl9Bw8=; b=c7ctpGlWg0kpIODZPov7KI2pw2cDVn3Ack1qgwVqqpbaYNX3xN3rO4ti VvwTjRswLVAxhV4E0wyye8his+NQeq5zCyce+7qKsXRjK/p8E7tnM6ikV NXm43qg83+EJBy58z+5H13TkR12pRhTKjaY3nM4k8oJeQ/HNX/+t3oP/u U=;
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:8yD15xxXRSGcjD/XCzPBngc9DxPP853/PgkN8oFhjKhBIeyv/JXnaUrY4/glzFrERp7S5P8Mje3K+7vhVmoN7dfk0jgCfZVAWgVDhZAQmAotU8WFDlXjN7jtdSNpVMhHXUVuqne8N0UdEc3iZlrU93u16zNaGhj2OQdvYOrvHYuHhMWs3Of08JrWMG11
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DjDQC0ELdg/5ldJa1aHgEBCxIMQIMqUQd3WjcxiBADhTmIbwOaDYJTA1QLAQEBDQEBKg0IAgQBAYEYgzgCgX4CJTgTAgQBAQESAQEFAQEBAgEGBHEThWgNhkQBAQEBAwEBEAsdBgEBLAwLBAIBCA4DBAEBHxAnCx0IAgQBEggaglCCVQMvAQ6cKQGBOgKKH3iBNIEBggcBAQYEBIFIQYMnGIIxAwaBOoJ7im8nHIFJRIFYgjAvPoJiAQECAYFfg0uCLoJENDoIS1ALPT4DKgULuymBFQqDGYoPk3URg16LG5ZhlDwMgQKMFpgPAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFrJIFZcBU7gmlQFwIOjh8MFhWDOYUUhUpzOAIGCgEBAwl8il4BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,241,1616457600"; d="scan'208";a="898445721"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Jun 2021 05:03:47 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-aln-004.cisco.com [173.36.7.19]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 15253kIk029212 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:03:46 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) by xbe-aln-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:03:46 -0500
Received: from xfe-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.122) by xfe-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:03:46 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xfe-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 00:03:46 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Vy3H7mykLOWuFMnP5hKzNlT/pEHv7t9L18U5+LGCJag0zFMy/BWv68NMMAyPGlPcsWoc9OU/qh5JbSvAjEw8PJe3iwd0x0rUhOSK77USCoQNhUb0ZOsYAyv/wFOwcRe1kEISvNV9PYOWxAxLzfKqeUX8PfABFa0zEz3xu+kV45IEEckxxdc/z2GUt/ev69967eLZPjJgezSk27mMwlIl/txErDQ0oGDSz0IqUNjAHCaS7YLK425geiBLQ86ymJ3KycTvs4ATvaJyTpLHOBa4htnyjLWMS5ltMcJ1e4jMwhtnZPCHK33MsMjLWH1h59pIuHQo4leDYmy3hTR2emhH7g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RMHOCqU+HJzYTX2NXa0r/vJugOLLjEMFzj/64wMLyGA=; b=CjC9RRd79RVnwOeB+vV0wztHqvSJ08L0uRJ/vGjZ9ITaXn7oXJO+fltPWO22/Bv4O0SdfN1Xu2ZQW8oBE2WE63yxRBkUU9aQKrYqzE0UykC7AlNBCz6tAbG+13kglEtKdx3M1zsQPEXdY/CERAMLVG4+8RyeqfCDUB2Qz+5xb9J0AxxV5glKrlaB9h1JWdSA5xf3Gnbx/WT0MZz2Cbp097GrMdyl+Sd3WkUxsvMQ7IM4QyJEiHdVZ53Hoojv4SPLsm9aH2yxfOnl2haR3Bp98JC2NdQTCMTnpGPr4wi8Cd/3vE3pnOx57mRat3P2l+3P8EjdPGzqMir1oek23Xnktw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=RMHOCqU+HJzYTX2NXa0r/vJugOLLjEMFzj/64wMLyGA=; b=DNqDSoCwem6t2QyKiANHmon2xkO+b05U3rYtA/4He0Dbc+Uod9AQFzK5jf7vRLfCFmQuLIBs+Cim27QujnNNf2izK61l5dKfp4t02pQpQNuQk59hMr9nWI7Ty3COb6XmGgwTvN8kZ7TRqY9b2pUDrrX8GpoxXXbdFxEbODCOTno=
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:1c1::14) by SJ0PR11MB5119.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:2d6::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4173.21; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:03:45 +0000
Received: from BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5df9:c2f0:149e:56d2]) by BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5df9:c2f0:149e:56d2%4]) with mapi id 15.20.4195.020; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 05:03:45 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
Thread-Index: AQHXUowXF8tEM3FFh0+SRRuAlF2giqsALv6w
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 05:03:45 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB43372EFF9F68D787E4F582D4C13D9@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <m2wnrlcitn.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <m2wnrlcitn.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: chopps.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;chopps.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2602:306:36ca:6640:f889:afbf:d65f:b142]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4ffab77d-6b8b-4b9a-6731-08d92583cc8c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SJ0PR11MB5119:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SJ0PR11MB51194205CD085F5D9A6EF69CC13D9@SJ0PR11MB5119.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Ai9+1T0UhqhvrMhz1PXBqJztOaSt6XrELYXBhOVGI4xSmqyY0gKhfRH/tkYwVce+JxFCLgztqseoBrXEUqBXRBBtJnn9RX9BfCO/NHcQUCXzPe/ZVTX7r9BSU1opTgl3x3D+v06HxI04wmqum8MX8FjIImMAS6x8rrEzKwtpUanXrBvd6LJVwfxa55xVMHQ+DkPuYaE5IU8/DVPpzmgNqB1Vca1OUprKHR2czCEbObJeRRL8OkFFjoyDMdx7/zWBk8foFg+Fsla133/TidXjg+/LUW9tUNwgEhyyGNzC6WcMJdfHhsR29MUk6ORxNJyroJ2LBNGVu5ZkrMEiBJD97JmN8wVvnjQLRafbAlLE5MXDZWuxtFduICwXrKVFvQHgFuyyAuF+dT4b/PbbIy+MuB9AYoyNLjpDm+LczbKNA4CrsGavTJt2MDobkg3BqAXQocCYkur2VxIQ5TA0mlOXFadM2CaNtutH0Y1OEqY8AGx7dPZu3NW+3tGt6Hu2R4A3tlJpi0qhJoziprz6dQdIrE9emuu4j80bY3P8nlL2Bz1QOiIfivpJ02oUDzHDnMxpTrtIrTsFt/+qhfN/n9Q2Kz6dY1hSozvRXqbfXTSQy2Fm85hW2Ualwbw0aORq009beoGyE602Xo6vPoLD4jQwGLCxA9pmNEyQdx+4QUXEaptt9Ua0plihxE+T4L3cGQTYCzg+OM3KVkxHFOavUVtGppDtHD0lDlL+vlwrGl3a7rYXE4C8TyJjhWm5ES0N1oV4
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(366004)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(966005)(478600001)(8936002)(76116006)(83380400001)(2906002)(66476007)(186003)(33656002)(66556008)(7696005)(66946007)(71200400001)(64756008)(55016002)(52536014)(53546011)(9686003)(316002)(6506007)(38100700002)(122000001)(110136005)(5660300002)(8676002)(86362001)(66446008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 4ffab77d-6b8b-4b9a-6731-08d92583cc8c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Jun 2021 05:03:45.0683 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: QFDU+ixBBItxO0/AiV1EPeAS7WGGt4l02P8hZOxf44H/jW+K+LAeG7FOFP5neXZwBSNOExs8WGXwOsc4qn7KbQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SJ0PR11MB5119
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.19, xbe-aln-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/_qe7I7X6tqRJ3AkmYpcFbKVKrjI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID Advertisement"
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 05:03:54 -0000

I support adoption of this draft.

I believe that there are use cases for algorithm specific adjacency-sids - primarily (and non-controversially) to provide algorithm specific repair paths.

As others have commented, other use cases mentioned in this draft involve introducing significant new functionality which has not been discussed or accepted by the WG (e.g., resource allocation). This topic deserves to be reviewed by the WG on its own merit in a separate draft.

This draft should confine itself to defining the new advertisements required to support algorithm specific adjacency-sids and discussing the repair path use case.

I would also like to see some discussion of deployment considerations including:

a)When to allocate/advertise algorithm specific adjacency-sids vs when to continue to use algorithm independent adjacency sids.
b)Strict-SID algo-sids are not useful
c)Use case should drive the type(s) of algorithm specific adjacency-sids allocated/advertised. For example,  if primary use case is for algorithm specific repair paths, then only sids with B flag set ("eligible for protection") are required.

Simply allocating algorithm specific adjacency SIDs for all supported algorithms all the time is a recipe for bloating the protocol link advertisements unnecessarily.

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 1:57 PM
> To: lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: chopps@chopps.org
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
> 
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-
> sid/
> 
> Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021
> 
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
> that applies to this draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee and Chris.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr