IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 24 May 2021 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D1D3A2CE7; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1lQaO5DZ5v7; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2A73A2CE8; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id o17-20020a17090a9f91b029015cef5b3c50so11451111pjp.4; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2hZW1KDGgQbBAyOf+ACL8Xbun07Fd47c3Q1QvTUEOvA=; b=HP13te5HEhIX+AD+YZMNg17UJzdM043sPdwRr/8wYTLzrczb6Z6D6djsrCoALCNnUN JAUAfSMjHQaQkg29rl6aZ0eiU702VILOz5Nn4fKkUyJmAjM5Frs6VeSSyGRzVKNeju1Y teov8OvPimEgp0ywzbhKtY3kofzjkssHw17RYDNZeXFwpySjTc8Rqlv+MzSnainTaRkZ ctVBNHpMX70RXJSD05BeOcqk3gdwtsnsmpoufnyhB6q8aHTL953X+x9e6mlsSGwZNrr1 XwasXazLC5byZB5tDvME3lRrqItYUN5XT4scidIKTshdwCq19YGg1V+TL+wjqdp1CXDj TpfA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2hZW1KDGgQbBAyOf+ACL8Xbun07Fd47c3Q1QvTUEOvA=; b=L5TMg2q8iYrGgsdOICQe7qUeDXn5+lFH7SA3jK4oELvZrLZUAJmdUCpG9qGt0wnkoZ Ric5VehwEYKk8+otG7l0mDJarviuDZEtl6+wiBDF9hDh+YhZBRnqjhHfyPNRE4o1q8V6 3w9RsnlMeJXalkecUzo3RavOyhmjHB3dlQvFX9bI2eohOd5IqBHQ7l/0L35tCUipIWQ1 6zdBRD94d/roIh86qvSKBjUYdgyOmIEwUtp/9/Z55/N1d4oGNzRgECDKhKi6iiaoU8WU 8GQb+zRA2n96czu2HL9tKNibTjm/xCTUrgc9Jn0EsIA67r7xT76eFv9B2OsOWCU7pCEl b7jA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qZ4UcOFlXJSCwtYgVyKYhFnz6CAyEXfwmABVEqYR2Btgom2iy OmyxRd+NsiC0ODw8+0fmjEE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL2Cge8cDUMvZjrSnAybBo8c4dD5Cicsv4kAsZ7z1pX/TaFXLk6qY8lKaaA2dzGfJ+rxHLxA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4386:: with SMTP id in6mr25811450pjb.160.1621870951208; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id mp21sm15418714pjb.50.2021.05.24.08.42.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <8446C3B2-6D6F-4C73-B10C-D99E6914749D@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A829F025-AD18-41F4-9CFB-978429946198"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 08:42:29 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+-tSzyY_=pfECpQm2S=4_qpKYZcO=N_-6uWyuEhKUcWya-WMg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn" <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>, "draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org" <draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
To: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
References: <202105200955495710804@zte.com.cn> <CY4PR05MB357659CAE530C61E253AC958D52A9@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CA+RyBmVRqpSxxFoDKEtdv=zSu6gXbdyDFbpuM7ek93La1n5Hew@mail.gmail.com> <E63007E1-4C5E-479B-A4EE-7EADF93B058A@tony.li> <D363EE45-B866-43EE-B7AD-68B5D70E17E1@cisco.com> <m2eedx9bpy.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org> <8414EAB5-BFA0-4A81-8F1F-BEE5BC9BC67C@cisco.com> <CA+-tSzxrMncSbBhiRrCWq8XD4JLWar6j1ROocUG4FCu-P+NJUA@mail.gmail.com> <9C494532-DF21-4D76-AC97-41917E6DBD94@tony.li> <CA+-tSzyY_=pfECpQm2S=4_qpKYZcO=N_-6uWyuEhKUcWya-WMg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/7kJ55EWsOFwMaQiLXDDkgoaqIvk>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 15:42:39 -0000


> On May 24, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> wrote:
> 
> I thought that it might help operators and vendors think about these components.



I would have no objection to simply enumerating the possibilities and noting the consistency requirement.

Tony


> 
> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:33 AM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li <mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 24, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu <mailto:anoop@alumni.duke.edu>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think it might be a good idea if the draft mentioned what delay(s) "SHOULD" be used.
> 
> Why?
> 
> It seems like this is local to a domain. The network administrator is free to do as he sees fit and include whatever parameters make sense to them. As long as the network is self-consistent, that should operate correctly.
> 
> Tony
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email