Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Thu, 13 May 2021 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9893A2D85; Thu, 13 May 2021 00:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5lFEg-e_K7ty; Thu, 13 May 2021 00:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4303A2D84; Thu, 13 May 2021 00:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.217]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 5264737E627294565340; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:34:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 26FE74132BC5D6DC1B83; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:34:56 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 14D7YZPh055762; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:34:35 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 13 May 2021 15:34:35 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 15:34:35 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af9609cd68b44b64798
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202105131534352994184@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <202105131528535473925@zte.com.cn>
References: 0BAE6DBA-04A3-4A3A-A1E3-14EFAA0FBE68@cisco.com, 202105131528535473925@zte.com.cn
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
Cc: acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 14D7YZPh055762
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/z5Tpuy4HzF0blllm_0ekMkE-CfY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 07:35:03 -0000

Sorry for spelling mistakens in the previous email.


updated text:
















Hi WG,






I have a little doubt about the scheme described in this document.


See the following example:






S ---- X1 ----- X2 ---- ... ... ----- X10 ----- D


    \----------------------------------------------/






Suppose the links in S---X1---X2...---D have the same bandwidth  10G, and the link S-D has bandwidth 1G.


Suppose that we select "reference bandwidth = 100G", then, 


each link  in S---X1---X2...---D will have the same bandwidth-metric  10 (i.e., 100/10)


link S-D will have a bandwidth-metric 100 (i.e., 100/1)






So flex-algo path from S to D based on bandwidth-metric will be S-D, not S---X1---X2...---D, because the later has a large cumulative bandwitdh-metric (i.e., 11*10).


But our expect path should not be S-D, but S---X1---X2...---D, as it has large bandwidth.


Do I misunderstand anything ?






Regards,


PSF





















发件人:AceeLindem(acee)
收件人:lsr@ietf.org;
抄送人:draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org;
日 期 :2021年05月13日 05:49
主 题 :[Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

 

Esteemed Members of the LSR WG,


 


This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:


 


     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con/    


 


Please indicate your support or objection by May 27th, 2021.


 


Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


 


Thanks,


Chris and Acee