Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
<peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn> Wed, 27 February 2019 08:36 UTC
Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A46130E8A for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:36:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aOg3RwyEZ3hz for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8479B130E86 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:36:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.217]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id E3F1E1E0864DDABE6202 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:36:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id D147CED152FD76993074; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:36:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp04.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.203]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with SMTP id x1R8a91X015253; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:36:09 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp01[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:36:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:36:11 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2af95c764bfb39140261
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201902271636111453989@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: acee@cisco.com
Cc: lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn x1R8a91X015253
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/FzvKPspijpQbwZ8LNBSQGiSxJiU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:36:22 -0000
Support, as this draft provide useful originial source router-id of prefix, as the same as RFC7794. For topology deducing, it seems too hard to work according to current description in the document. For example, It is hard to represent mulptile links between two nodes if we only know two node-id information but lack of interface IP address or interface-id that is link attribute not be included in prefix flooding, thus there is no way to consider which link could be contained in which TE path, also, so many TE parameters of link need to be supplied for the deducing topology, TE metric, bandwidth, etc. Maybe there already have a complete solution but just not describe detailedly in document. Thanks Deccan(Shaofu peng) 原始邮件 发件人:AceeLindem(acee) <acee@cisco.com> 收件人:lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>; 日 期 :2019年02月13日 21:26 主 题 :[Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01 _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019. All authors have responded to the IPR poll and there is one https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext It is listed multiple times but references the same CN201810650141. Thanks, Acee
- [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Naiming Shen (naiming)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Lizhenbin
- [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OS… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… zhang.zheng
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OS… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OS… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OS… Acee Lindem (acee)
- [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… John E Drake
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Huzhibo
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF E… Acee Lindem (acee)