IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CD6130FCF for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4wgngHp-WQy for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59909130EBD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 874EB345BFAD14745C9F for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:54 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.111]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:31:50 -0800
From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "acee@cisco.com" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
Thread-Index: AQHUzoSoXCVYzLzYSU+yhOe9XdPHCqXztSlw
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:31:49 +0000
Message-ID: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B591CC@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <201902271636111453989@zte.com.cn> <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFADDD8036@dggemm509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFADDD8036@dggemm509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.247.143]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B591CCsjceml521mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/xtEKr-k18ehJIQ5EhubJYFBADF4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:32:00 -0000

Support.

Best Regards,
Huaimo
From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Huzhibo
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 5:09 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org; acee@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

Support.It is useful for collect cross-area IGP topologies

Ths
Zhibo Hu

From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn<mailto:peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 4:36 PM
To: acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01


Support, as this draft provide useful originial source router-id of prefix, as the same as RFC7794.

For topology deducing, it seems too hard to work according to current description in the document. For example, It is hard to represent mulptile links between two nodes if we only know two node-id information but lack of interface IP address or interface-id that is link attribute not be included in prefix flooding, thus there is no way to consider which link could be contained in which TE path, also, so many TE parameters of link need to be supplied for the deducing topology, TE metric, bandwidth, etc. Maybe there already have a complete solution but just not describe detailedly in document.



Thanks

Deccan(Shaofu peng)






原始邮件
发件人：AceeLindem(acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
收件人：lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org> <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>;
日 期 ：2019年02月13日 21:26
主 题 ：[Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for PrefixOriginator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr


This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019.

All authors have responded to the IPR poll and there is one  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext
It is listed multiple times but references the same CN201810650141.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email