IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 18 February 2019 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283F2130EFC for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 05:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=PF1ui9G/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=ohfs1kAZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pdi3GqToLKMe for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 05:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D25DA128B14 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 05:22:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11074; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1550496122; x=1551705722; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=t3f+uuh9UY2e8l4fawR9e+WICcSvyP97gQR5dyzCVk8=; b=PF1ui9G/ynUKubVxWJaixmBo6Q0jixmZrxuorcukRdxBxkKdHLXFeBkq FkNJ/4c9fPa1ciKcqDXbZzkppkrEG+VgTNagQP51K+QNQZtNI+zRnbyFR pt/5cYq/u7Am5dv4jDsGnaApDN1Xn8hYWqmiNpQi7qhcj0LFiJSZeFx+E Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:o31zxBSd6uMLH06aPHRmMrbdvtpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBNfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOiM7Gt9IWUVq13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJAAAasWpc/4UNJK1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDSMkKwNndAQLJ4QGg0cDhFCLGUqCDZIphXGBJANUCwEBJQeEQAIXg1kiNAkNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFSgEBAQEDIwoTAQE4DwIBCBEEAQEkBwICAjAdCAIEARIIgxmBDkwDFQECDKA5AooUcYEvgngBAQWEfRiCCwMFjEQXgUA/gRABRoJMgx4CAgEXgUkVDweCXDGCJpAtkxkJAoc7izOBcIVVizuDJ4cchUqMMQIEAgQFAg0BAQWBRjiBVnAVO4Jsghw2gziFFIU/cg6BGo49AQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,384,1544486400"; d="scan'208,217";a="238888927"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Feb 2019 13:22:01 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (xch-aln-007.cisco.com [173.36.7.17]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1IDM1MP026621 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:22:01 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 07:22:00 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:22:00 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 07:22:00 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=t3f+uuh9UY2e8l4fawR9e+WICcSvyP97gQR5dyzCVk8=; b=ohfs1kAZBXlBtS6vrmcKjloFzH71tCyscFMyx8aKke9I4lLG+h/si/vo6APrlemDUr2WRPEEcczVDqTWEzR+nvPRu0lSkuzveSxZJeZ11qtwFRqdvxkDOJdHgVRfSBedjC2WIcM7gVjgygrOzCRbgEj17XjtzQfYyTtX7akU3dM=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.237.19) by BYAPR11MB3384.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.186.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1622.16; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:21:58 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d0b:e766:ca1d:aac0]) by BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d0b:e766:ca1d:aac0%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1622.018; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:21:58 +0000
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
Thread-Index: AQHUw5+cNf+RMjgnmUmGQ2p0NVfSb6Xljk8g
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:21:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3638721E27A230B39F174D5EC1630@BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <A4351C7F-183D-4490-BD3C-5ADC5C087F84@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A4351C7F-183D-4490-BD3C-5ADC5C087F84@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ginsberg@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c8:1001::111]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 613846f3-c4d9-4d77-3f2e-08d695a40f69
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3384;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3384:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BYAPR11MB3384;23: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
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3384FF03D04D2E8E5AC0BF89C1630@BYAPR11MB3384.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 09525C61DB
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(229853002)(236005)(478600001)(6436002)(76176011)(256004)(71190400001)(55016002)(14454004)(71200400001)(66574012)(6306002)(54896002)(25786009)(9686003)(790700001)(6116002)(966005)(33656002)(106356001)(68736007)(186003)(97736004)(102836004)(2906002)(46003)(6246003)(2501003)(606006)(5660300002)(53936002)(11346002)(476003)(316002)(7736002)(8676002)(8936002)(110136005)(486006)(446003)(86362001)(105586002)(6506007)(53546011)(7696005)(81166006)(81156014)(74316002)(99286004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3384; H:BYAPR11MB3638.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Kwm4A/k9GUgQlCxswJSYYNu0QaifSrFtxYZ/7VvKJwgBfTQZM9y/S/Us2ULoQo6jgtfqneQ+i0fu8sxgaxK/KjU6j/Al67Od798+e0+1cuUA0WtS2DGk/QjKrnoQ3bXQFUI3Bus3G0kgQ2gd4YHVJ/Eb7cJVr4FcBem8nczlIsPtmdrlyhvC9YVBuL5wZgFebyFTdX/3GNd6Gj3z7GTgmXq59KtKaNI+gu3nhFgLYUvkC+V95znh/xt7CpjPk0w6NllMkdMcQ0kMxvWh+p9tkFyb8eJbH60ELS8vJ6QaMRyyhP+EQLPtOWTVlWAi99BRiIpdMn0rMr12TKgp8r4/+zE8KbPLGRYuXBe+6+k3WdDIVfFFjI+LtdD/Zen8eJ5/eh8QgQ+rtOErfSM1LYyarfOg73Tp6hUIAmk1oHr1qW8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB3638721E27A230B39F174D5EC1630BYAPR11MB3638namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 613846f3-c4d9-4d77-3f2e-08d695a40f69
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Feb 2019 13:21:58.3873 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3384
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.17, xch-aln-007.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/jFmg9F3mzXF9RwobjhsxE7oWJi0>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:22:05 -0000

To the extent that the draft defines functionality equivalent to that defined in IS-IS RFC 7794 – specifically a means to advertise the source router-id of a given advertisement – it defines a necessary and useful extension to the OSPF protocol – and I support that work.

However, in its current form the draft discusses use of this mechanism for inter-area topology discovery. This idea is seriously flawed – as has been discussed extensively on the WG list.
The draft also discusses uses cases related to ERLD, the direction for which is very much uncertain at this time.

I therefore feel that the current content of the draft is not what I would expect to see approved by the WG as an RFC and therefore have significant reservations about moving forward with the existing content.

I do want to see a draft addressing the source router-id advertisement gap move forward – and if this draft is reduced to focus on that then I can enthusiastically support adoption – but in its current form I cannot indicate support.

   Les


From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 5:26 AM
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extension for Prefix Originator" - draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext-01

This begins a two week adoption poll for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list before 12:00 AM UTC on Thursday, February 28th, 2019.

All authors have responded to the IPR poll and there is one  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-wang-lsr-ospf-prefix-originator-ext
It is listed multiple times but references the same CN201810650141.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email