Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 03 March 2021 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C943A1400 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 06:43:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KDt60PesHuCO for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 06:43:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBE23A13FE for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 06:43:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=874; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1614782581; x=1615992181; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=59vUWZdtuUmG30agrzUx3JW2zcZA/+qpK5UQ0QD46j8=; b=XbxMDiTTUd8edEAiXYqrzdjWReGGsk+SgoPna82Zqkr6PIoDX+iBLC9B pi+i1qiHXiaqISksXqNQuf3Elj3OW+8Vg69QXQLu2ubPjINnwJyEau5ae jWSWFEB8bHjEdxwf7RQcjuaMjv6sBD/jhfnHGB/+7agQeH3ytHihBIciz s=;
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0APAACLnz9glxbLJq1iGgEBAQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBARIBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAgIBAQEBQIE9AwEBAQELAYN2AScShHKJBIgpCCiaT4F8CwEBAQ80BAEBh?= =?us-ascii?q?E0CgXsmNgcOAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBAQGGQ4ZFAQUjD?= =?us-ascii?q?wEFQRAJAhgCAiYCAlcGAQwIAQGCbIMIkgObEXaBMoVYg0eBRIEOKgGJT4NzQ?= =?us-ascii?q?oFJQoE4DII5Lj6HVIJfBIMugSOBM5QGAaYogwaDL5hlBQcDH5NVkAGUVaJGg?= =?us-ascii?q?VsELYFZMxoIGxWDJU8ZDY44jjBAA2cCBgEJAQEDCYwTAQE?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,220,1610409600"; d="scan'208";a="33880601"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Mar 2021 14:42:57 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.52] (ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com [10.60.140.52]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 123Egu21014489; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:42:56 GMT
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>
Cc: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Rajesh M <mrajesh@juniper.net>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, William Britto A J <bwilliam@juniper.net>
References: <161401476623.19237.3808413288895066510@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOj+MMGZppwYtNr4t0rJoy3BKWaBYqHiJ_esM1XNFTNxbm8c5w@mail.gmail.com> <08882555-009B-4068-ABB0-20B0D165D722@tony.li> <2c2605a8-95c6-a477-b1b5-5ae4d4de222a@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMGf=zQMGP+q+XX-MJi-qMrOddmq_+wmrXFS+JQX_PsudQ@mail.gmail.com> <25a8853a-72a3-3013-6a87-d8049ed7a3da@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMH2a=T-vBsD6QVChmybmdQhQXFcDg1np+v+bpKOWPbtKA@mail.gmail.com> <8be3198f-4c9c-2bae-9ce9-f283ac5305a1@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFf_QymQLOG4mR9F_3h-njo0k2Le6eE1bKUkK6NmcLboQ@mail.gmail.com> <42fbaa46-7434-39fb-b5a1-97fe0c7866d3@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMG5j=HcZhtni+ROVU4zjzgHDKQhNmgxpBqpx97Jf3uU4w@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR05MB3576051C31A5A8DD704B8378D5989@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMG5PkA6tsSNUu54HWBYrrWW5FgZzvndm5wTY5L8PXm8iw@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR05MB357694774EA7040EDA8C90D3D5989@CY4PR05MB3576.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGwmf=q0zCbM5E1WvVgqGqmL4C=OLzRVfUNywp73FJ1ww@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <2f677e7d-2424-ab33-64b2-7d879b89a336@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 15:42:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMGwmf=q0zCbM5E1WvVgqGqmL4C=OLzRVfUNywp73FJ1ww@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.52, ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/skKM-SAlkxq9-VkC7jKj5zATyUg>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 14:43:04 -0000

Hi Robert,

On 03/03/2021 14:55, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> 
>     Yes your proposal defines constrains for FAD. But ny point is that
>     if you are defining such constrain called Max Link Delay you better
>     make sure that parameter used to measure such Maximum is well
>     generated and flooded. ____
> 
>     <Shraddha> The Maximum delay in FAD is compared against min delay
>     advertised per link as  in RFC 8570.____
> 
>                             so maximum delay is not required to be
>     generated and flooded  for every link.
> 
> 
> I was talking about requirements of generation and flooding of  min 
> delay for the needs of this new constrain.

yes, but the min delay is already being used by flex-algo as one of the 
possible metrics, so noting new is required.

thank,
Peter
> 
> Thx,
> R.
>