IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal...

"Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com> Thu, 29 May 2008 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C407E3A6BC4; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610143A6974 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.260, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfoUlfmldA4U for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com (smtp-fw-2101.amazon.com [72.21.196.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3200B3A6BFB for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,459,1199664000"; d="scan'208";a="55058941"
Received: from smtp-in-0201.sea3.amazon.com ([172.20.19.24]) by smtp-border-fw-out-2101.iad2.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 May 2008 21:10:00 +0000
Received: from ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com (ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com [10.248.163.23]) by smtp-in-0201.sea3.amazon.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4TL9wIJ018291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 May 2008 21:09:58 GMT
Received: from EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.28]) by ex-hub-4102.ant.amazon.com ([10.248.163.23]) with mapi; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:09:58 -0700
From: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:09:56 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] a modest proposal...
Thread-Index: AcjBz1THP5pl8N6aSsKa0bHyBHW+JgAABIUA
Message-ID: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C845@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
References: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C706@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <20080529203743.GT27379@mercury.ccil.org> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C806@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <20080529210229.GW27379@mercury.ccil.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080529210229.GW27379@mercury.ccil.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal...
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> See my post responding to Peter.  I"d rather deprecate "sgn-US" to
> "sgn-ase" rather than just "ase".

Noted.

> True, but then it would deviate from how lookup is actually implemented
> in various places, like JVM resource bundles and Apache (when filtering
> fails).

Mmm.... maybe. But JVMs don't even do the current BCP 47 (well, most people's don't... they can be made to, at least with the most modern JVMs :-) ). Note too that I said originally that they MAY treat the primary-extlang sequence as atomic, not that it is required. Creating a new algorithm ("Extended Lookup"?) might be preferable to altering an exiting algorithm.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:02 PM
> To: Phillips, Addison
> Cc: John Cowan; LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] a modest proposal...
>
> Phillips, Addison scripsit:
>
> > Really? 'sgn'?
>
>
> > That's what I had in mind. Note that 4647 would not necessarily
> diverge
> > from 2616. It could be done as a note in Lookup, for example and 2616
> > doesn't do Lookup.
>
>
> --
> Go, and never darken my towels again!           John Cowan
>         --Rufus T. Firefly                      http://ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email