Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Sun, 09 December 2007 05:57 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1FAn-0003s6-7I; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:53 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1FAm-0003pY-7b for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:52 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1FAl-0003ml-Sn for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:51 -0500
Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1FAl-0008Oj-HP for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:51 -0500
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1J1FAl-0003eF-57; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:51 -0500
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:57:51 -0500
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
Message-ID: <20071209055751.GH22311@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20071207213756.GC3346@mercury.ccil.org> <fjel72$d7k$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fjel72$d7k$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Frank Ellermann scripsit: > | IANA MUST > > I consider a "MUST" while talking with IANA as rude. What, after they just botched updating the File-Date record? Give me a break. > There is far too much MUSTard in the I-D, MUSTard > should be reserved for cases where ignoring it is > both plausible and would cause havoc. It has been ignored in the past and it has created havoc. > Can we please at least consider that neither IANA nor > expert are idiots ? Idiots, no; prone to careless mistakes, definitely. People are not protocol engines. > > 4.1: s/Sometimes there is a choice/There is always a choice/, > > which is much nearer the truth. > > It's "almost always" then. Can you think of a counterexample? (Hint: It requires a language with no language distinctions, script distinctions, or variant distinctions.) > BTW, I vaguely recall that we didn't want chains: You didn't want them, you mean. Everyone else had no trouble with them. > > 8 [record-jar]: add "chapter 5". > > Not sure what you're talking about. The bibliographic entry for [record-jar] is incomplete. > | Future work on the Language Subtag Registry has been > | limited to inserting or replacing whole records > | preformatted for IANA by the Language Subtag Reviewer > | as described in Section 3.3 of this document and archiving > | and making publically available the forwarded registration > | form. > > Is that an attempt to kill the 4( ALPHA ) reservation ? Of course not. It means that under *this* (future) RFC there won't be any. BCP 47 can always be revised by issuing a new RFC. > > My suggestions for invalid tags are xxx-Defg-HQ, > > de-1996-1996, en-nedis, and ar-a-aaa-b-bbb-a-ccc. > > The xxx-Defq-HQ isn't guaranteed to be invalid forever, > or did I miss a clue ? There are four reasons for invalidity, expressed by the four examples. One is inherently temporal (unknown subtag); the others are eternal. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen. I am the clue-finder, the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number. --Bilbo _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App.… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Montenegrin what-if Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … John Cowan