Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Thu, 29 May 2008 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7EE3A6939; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575173A6939 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.315
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.284, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlf-kg7wngql for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.99]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 697E13A68E8 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2008 20:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12415 invoked from network); 29 May 2008 03:45:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (71.229.245.230) by smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.99) with ESMTP; 29 May 2008 03:45:03 -0000
Message-ID: <002601c8c13e$60217e40$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.636.1211925384.15310.ltru@ietf.org> <004d01c8c065$838b8d50$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <008001c8c105$cc421820$64c64860$@net> <001501c8c121$646ebe80$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483E14ED.6030100@malform.no>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 21:45:01 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Leif Halvard Silli <lhs at malform dot no> wrote:

>> While we can provide constructive feedback, we should not allow 
>> ourselves or others to confuse this with "running" ISO or taking over 
>> their work items.
>
> Seriously, let's allow others to care for their own confusion. ;-)

The problem is worse than you might think.  We've been accused in the 
past of trying to overrun ISO.  It's important (at least to me) that we 
don't set ourselves up for such false accusations.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Arvada, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru