Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 18 July 2009 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2AB3A6B07 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.824, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4d9QBQ3KygA for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 005A43A6B8C for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2009 20:12:02 -0000
Received: from p508FE471.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.228.113] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 18 Jul 2009 22:12:02 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19yUtUEGeNyGoXnlEKe9aLE5noQU7+hJtrP7kFLjG de2KA09s0Fo+bD
Message-ID: <4A622C89.8090407@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:11:53 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@amazon.com>
References: <48037FF9.9030103@gmx.de> <48049274.3090501@gmx.de> <4A61B8B7.7030200@gmx.de> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843B4F@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <4A61F5C2.3050906@gmx.de> <20090718175918.GA3899@mercury.ccil.org> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843BEC@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA01AB843BEC@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.71
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Issue 113 (language tag matching (Accept-Language) vs RFC4647), was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:22:09 -0000

Phillips, Addison wrote:
>> Is there some reason why you aren't referring to BCP 47?
> 
> I think they are trying to be specific about their reference to avoid having <Language-Tag> change underneath them. 
> ...

Exactly.

We need a precise reference to an ABNF production and definition here. 
Citing the BCP instead of the concrete document would make it impossible 
to refer to a specific section (or even the name of a production).

BR, Julian