Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03

Thanks. I figure it is better to be more explicit than less, so given that
they are both valid, it's probably better to leave as is.

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 22:11, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>wrote:

>  Mark,
>
> Once more to ABNF.
>
>     t-ext=    "t"                      ; Extension
>              (("-" lang *("-" field)) ; Source + optional field(s)
>              / 1*("-" field))         ; Field(s) only (no source)
>
>  The 2nd and 3rd lines need not have the extra parenthesizing, forming the
> production:
>
>     t-ext=    "t"                      ; Extension
>              ("-" lang *("-" field))  ; Source + optional field(s)
>              / 1*("-" field)          ; Field(s) only (no source)
>
>  This may only be useful in complicated productions.  Moreover, the 2nd
> line might also be simplified to:
>
>              "-" lang *("-" field)    ; Source + optional field(s)
>
>  ...however, RFC 5234 recommends to do as you've done (but both variants
> are valid), so this is up to you to decide.
>
> Mykyta
>
>
> 13.07.2011 21:51, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>
> I just posted an update for items raised on this list.
>
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03
>
>  Diffs:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-davis-t-langtag-ext-03.txt
>
>
>    - Fixed title
>    - Fixed a few places to make it clearer that it is results-based
>    (Felix)
>    - Removed duplicate paragraph
>    - Fixed ABNF nits
>    - Fixed typo
>
>  Please see if that addresses the concerns.
>
>  Mark
> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 01:02, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>wrote:
>
>> 13.07.2011 09:48, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>>
>>  I think "BCP 47 Extension T" is a very bad title...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed. Here is something for a start: "A Language Tag Extension for
>>> Transliterations/Transcriptions"
>>>
>>
>>  But the abstract refers to translations as well. I wonder if
>> "A Language Tag Extension 'Trans'"
>> would be acceptable - "Trans" is cryptic, but more suggestive than "T".
>>
>> Or, as the abstract says "transformed content, including content that has
>> been transliterated, transcribed, or translated, or in some other way
>> influenced by the source", what about
>>
>> "A Language Tag Extension for Transformations"
>>
>> (perhaps with the word "Text" before "Transformations")?
>>
>> Actually the pages banners now have "BCP 47 Transform Extension"...
>>
>> --
>> Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ltru mailing list
>> Ltru@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing listLtru@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
>