Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

[Hadriel Kaplan <[e-mail]>]

I think supporting public GRUUs is not hard for a Registrar or an SSP.  But in practice they don't always need them and in fact rarely use them today afaict, which means we'd be requiring something that is not actually required for GIN to work.  So one of two things will happen for those who don't need it - they'd either not do GRUU and the RFC would be partially implemented, leading to interop problems if the PBX expected and required it for Registration, or the SSP wouldn't do GIN at all.  Either case would be bad.

So I'm in favor of not making it a MUST.

That begs the question of what to do with it, though.

-hadriel

On Sep 6, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

This is a reminder of an ongoing MARTINI WG consensus call on the question of whether public GRUUs are mandatory to implement for SSPs.

Please respond to this email and post your opinion as to whether you agree that SSPs supporting MARTINI MUST implement support for public GRUUs.  Opinions on the topic of Temp GRUUs are to be posted in a separate thread.

This consensus call will last until September 12, 2010.

<ATT00001..c>