[MEDIACTRL] Re: Requirements Comment

["Eric Burger" <[e-mail]>]

I missed that one. IMHO, the AS has no need nor right to know the RTP address of the endpoint nor the termination address of the media server. What is the use case?

--
Sent from my wireless e-mail device. Sorry if terse.  We all need lemonade: see <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade> for what lemonade is.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Buko <[e-mail]>
To: Eric Burger; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tue Mar 20 06:16:38 2007
Subject: Requirements Comment

 

I have a general issue regarding our current set of requirements and thought it might be a good idea to get a thread going on this prior to our Thursday meeting.

 

draft-even-media-server-req-02.txt <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl/draft-even-media-server-req-02.txt>  states the following

“10.  The MS shall supply the media addresses (RTP transport address) to be used to the AS”

 

draft-dolly-xcon-mediacntrlframe-03.txt <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl/draft-dolly-xcon-mediacntrlframe-03.txt>  states the following

“REQ-MCP-11 - SIP/SDP SHALL be used to establish and modify RTP connections to a Media Server”

 

 

In my view, we have two main problems to solve.

1)     define a media control framework that will be used to transmit a given media control protocol.

2)    define a media control protocol used to control a media server.

 

I agree that the media control framework should use SIP/SDP to specify the protocol / transport used to negotiation the TCP port and transmit/receive the media control protocol.  

 

However, I would offer that the media control protocol defined by this group should be ..

1)     call control signaling agnostic

2)    media transport agnostic

 

 

 

For this requirement …

draft-even-media-server-req-02.txt <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl/draft-even-media-server-req-02.txt>  states the following

“10.  The MS shall supply the media addresses (RTP transport address) to be used to the AS”

I don’t understand why the AS would need the media addresses and would like to think that the AS would like to control a media server that may not be using RTP in all scenarios.

 

For this requirement …

draft-dolly-xcon-mediacntrlframe-03.txt <http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl/draft-dolly-xcon-mediacntrlframe-03.txt>  states the following

“REQ-MCP-11 - SIP/SDP SHALL be used to establish and modify RTP connections to a Media Server”

I agree that SIP/SDP should be used to establish/negotiate the TCP port/address used for media control transport, however I don’t think RTP comes into play from a media control framework perspective.  

 

 

My high level comment is that we should not limit the use of our media control protocol to media servers that only support SIP and RTP.

 

 

Steve Buko

 

_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.

_______________________________________________
MEDIACTRL mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mediactrl
Supplemental Web Site:
http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/mediactrl