IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 10 October 2012 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0694021F8658 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.833
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.833 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.766, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iKr2W82Nc9IQ for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E410A21F8647 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9AG9CZa024595; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:09:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9AG9Af2007710; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:09:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <50759DA6.9020900@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:09:10 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, Michael MacFaden <mrm@macfaden.com>
References: <50758E1C.6070706@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <50758E1C.6070706@neclab.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:09:16 -0000

Hi Mike,

As far as I know, you did the review of  draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
Can you please have a look to see if this latest version addresses your 
points at http://www.macfaden.com/ietf/iscsi-mib-1-reviewed.txt

Regards, Benoit
> Hi Ron and Benoit,
>
> The MIB doctors did a review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib a while back 
> and did comment on the text, but also on the MIB module itself.
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib)
>
> The STORM working group has gone through the review and updated the 
> draft to address these.
>
> Can you please ask the MIB doctors to review the ISCSI MIB module again?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>   Martin
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email