Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

[Michael MacFaden <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Benoit,

I reviewed the current #3 draft at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib/
the nits checker had a few items to review:
http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03.tx

There exist editorial comments to clean up, some noted below

- -- <a
href="./draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-03">draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-03</a>
&amp; remove this note.

but otherwise looks good to me.

Tests performed:
prunus% smistrip draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03
smistrip draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03
ISCSI-MIB: 3761 lines.
prunus% smilint -l9 ISCSI-MIB
smilint -l9 ISCSI-MIB
prunus% smidump -f tree ISCSI-MIB

Compared output of smidump -f identifiers from 01 draft to 03, no changes.
Verified all nonscalars begin with iscsiInstIndex index as described per
section 4 (Relationship to SNMP Contexts)
Verified marker objects were deprecated as stated in section 5.
Verified all three new objects added
  iscsiInstXNodeArchitecture
 iscsiSsnTaskReporting
  iscsiSsnProtocolLevel

items resolved from last review.
- - 4. IANA Considerations - check
- - 8. Intellectual property section -check
Rest of issues I reported in prior review were resolved previously on the
list.

s/
Mike MacFaden

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFRBiAsxTVOqsYmDtERAn2VAKDN/uPXEyiz5tAjgozx98ovFDyIUQCg0kBB
eK3FpOr48h6yIl59BmoZtyo=
=UDYf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----