IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Wed, 10 October 2012 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2C31F0381 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ou5dggoxWllf for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (hop-nat-141.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8D321F8607 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q9AGbaBJ023712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:37:42 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhubhoprd02.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.253]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:37:24 -0400
Received: from mxhub10.corp.emc.com (mxhub10.corp.emc.com [10.254.92.105]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q9AGbG4f032366; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:37:23 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.83]) by mxhub10.corp.emc.com ([10.254.92.105]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:37:19 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, Michael MacFaden <mrm@macfaden.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:37:18 -0400
Thread-Topic: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
Thread-Index: Ac2nAbkLNFycLLG0QyibNjjzOIKsKQAA39pw
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE7120DFAE83C@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <50758E1C.6070706@neclab.eu> <50759DA6.9020900@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <50759DA6.9020900@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 08:31:07 -0700
Cc: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, "storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:37:46 -0000

I observe that the storm WG did look at all of the suggested
functional enhancements and made some decisions about which ones
to include vs. not include.

Please keep in mind that the "m" in "storm" stands for "maintenance".

Thanks,
--David (storm WG co-chair)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Martin Stiemerling; MIB Doctors (E-mail); Michael MacFaden
> Cc: Ronald Bonica; storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> As far as I know, you did the review of  draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
> Can you please have a look to see if this latest version addresses your
> points at http://www.macfaden.com/ietf/iscsi-mib-1-reviewed.txt
> 
> Regards, Benoit
> > Hi Ron and Benoit,
> >
> > The MIB doctors did a review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib a while back
> > and did comment on the text, but also on the MIB module itself.
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib)
> >
> > The STORM working group has gone through the review and updated the
> > draft to address these.
> >
> > Can you please ask the MIB doctors to review the ISCSI MIB module again?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> >   Martin
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email