IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 14 January 2013 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2207521F84DD for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:26:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtgXbVv99UJV for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:26:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1112E21F84D0 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:26:05 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0EBQ4ZH016669; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:26:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.60.67.89] (ams-bclaise-8918.cisco.com [10.60.67.89]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0EBPHXV008544; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:25:32 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50F3EB1D.1040801@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:25:17 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, Michael MacFaden <mrm@macfaden.com>
References: <50758E1C.6070706@neclab.eu> <50759DA6.9020900@cisco.com> <50C858A9.6080905@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <50C858A9.6080905@neclab.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>, "storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <storm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:26:07 -0000

Hi Mike,

Can you please have a look to see if this latest version addresses your
points at http://www.macfaden.com/ietf/iscsi-mib-1-reviewed.txt

Regards, Benoit
> Benoit, MIB Doctors,
>
> Did anybody have time to check the updated iSCSI MIB?
>
> I would like to progress the draft to the IESG soon.
>
> Thank you in advance,
>
>   Martin
>
> On 10/10/2012 06:09 PM, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> As far as I know, you did the review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
>> Can you please have a look to see if this latest version addresses your
>> points at http://www.macfaden.com/ietf/iscsi-mib-1-reviewed.txt
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>> Hi Ron and Benoit,
>>>
>>> The MIB doctors did a review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib a while back
>>> and did comment on the text, but also on the MIB module itself.
>>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib)
>>>
>>> The STORM working group has gone through the review and updated the
>>> draft to address these.
>>>
>>> Can you please ask the MIB doctors to review the ISCSI MIB module 
>>> again?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>>   Martin
>>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email