Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 28 January 2013 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D9EE21F87C3 for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:02:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.823, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, TRACKER_ID=2.003, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KP0WnyyRy5U for <mib-doctors@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E3D21F8462 for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:02:32 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvMFAP0QA1GHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABFgkgjskwBgTyHXhZzgh4BAQEBAxIbRQcQAgEIDQQEAQELHQcyFAkIAgQBDQUIGodtAQuhWJx0jRSDSmEDlymEcYo7gneBbzU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,541,1355115600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="341310685"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2013 03:02:28 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2013 03:02:21 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 28 Jan 2013 03:02:45 -0500
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Michael MacFaden <mrm@macfaden.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
Thread-Index: AQHN/SRIxKhK858gNUGM2xWcliid25heXupg
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:02:45 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA078AE9@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <50F3EB1D.1040801@cisco.com> <50FCF2E8.1070300@cisco.com> <CAD3a8T=pF=Qb-0tYSx-6+9i4JCQUN0Wno=bM-M+eeodBeLHvcA@mail.gmail.com> <50FDCD01.6080508@cisco.com> <CAD3a8TkEUFo9AGCjX7sCN2n2guurrmo3sCzxZ9u3uNFP_1ijdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD3a8TkEUFo9AGCjX7sCN2n2guurrmo3sCzxZ9u3uNFP_1ijdg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA078AE9AZFFEXMB04globala_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:02:34 -0000

Hi Mike,

Did you also comment concerning the Security Considerations section?

It seems that it is not updated according to the last template version on the wiki as per https://svn.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/mib-security# (the last but final paragraph and the corresponding references).

I noticed this while performing the Gen-ART review of the document.

Regards,

Dan



From: mib-doctors-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Michael MacFaden
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 8:54 AM
To: Benoit Claise
Cc: MIB Doctors (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Request for MIB review of draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Benoit,

I reviewed the current #3 draft at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib/
the nits checker had a few items to review:
http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03.tx

There exist editorial comments to clean up, some noted below

- -- <a href="./draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-03">draft-ietf-storm-iscsi-cons-03</a> &amp; remove this note.

but otherwise looks good to me.

Tests performed:
prunus% smistrip draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03
smistrip draft-ietf-storm-iscsimib-03
ISCSI-MIB: 3761 lines.
prunus% smilint -l9 ISCSI-MIB
smilint -l9 ISCSI-MIB
prunus% smidump -f tree ISCSI-MIB

Compared output of smidump -f identifiers from 01 draft to 03, no changes.
Verified all nonscalars begin with iscsiInstIndex index as described per section 4 (Relationship to SNMP Contexts)
Verified marker objects were deprecated as stated in section 5.
Verified all three new objects added
  iscsiInstXNodeArchitecture
 iscsiSsnTaskReporting
  iscsiSsnProtocolLevel

items resolved from last review.
- - 4. IANA Considerations - check
- - 8. Intellectual property section -check
Rest of issues I reported in prior review were resolved previously on the list.

s/
Mike MacFaden

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFRBiAsxTVOqsYmDtERAn2VAKDN/uPXEyiz5tAjgozx98ovFDyIUQCg0kBB
eK3FpOr48h6yIl59BmoZtyo=
=UDYf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----