IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 published

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 15 March 2012 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837DE21F8584 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.703, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lFIztOMngVrp for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.144]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5817021F8577 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id q2FCS3eR011438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:28:03 +0100
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FCS2RG027014; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:28:02 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id q2FCRxbI006473; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:28:02 +0100
Message-ID: <4F61E04F.4020800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:27:59 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <20120224101611.22703.52041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F47688B.10508@gmail.com> <4F5E2F61.9040009@gmail.com> <611FBED3-349A-43E7-B4B9-0BC313EA4F7A@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <611FBED3-349A-43E7-B4B9-0BC313EA4F7A@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "<mif@ietf.org>" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 published
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:28:05 -0000

Le 12/03/2012 18:23, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
> <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>> But still RA uses 16bit lifetimes for default routes whereas this
>> draft uses 32bit lifetimes, right?
>
> Since the 16-bit lifetimes can be represented as 32-bit lifetimes, I
>  don't think it's an issue.

It may be an issue if DHCP Server sends a 32bit lifetime of a default
route and the Client stores this in its ND default router list
structures lifetime 16bit, no?

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email