Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 published

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0781721F868C for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.457
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.457 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.141, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JO6N63dCKR5r for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og122.obsmtp.com (exprod7og122.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B35A21F8684 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob122.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT14xIEHXw6yGOm4Fsweqz4P/sFU0qRs/@postini.com; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:45 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2646A1B83E2 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E6E19005C; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:23:44 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 published
Thread-Index: AQHM8uBsQi4512i5cE6t8t5dPnex2ZZnd0OAgAACEYA=
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:23:41 +0000
Message-ID: <611FBED3-349A-43E7-B4B9-0BC313EA4F7A@nominum.com>
References: <20120224101611.22703.52041.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F47688B.10508@gmail.com> <4F5E2F61.9040009@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F5E2F61.9040009@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_611FBED3349A43E7B4B90BC313EA4F7Anominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<mif@ietf.org>" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 published
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:23:47 -0000

On Mar 12, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com<mailto:alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
But still RA uses 16bit lifetimes for default routes whereas this draft
uses 32bit lifetimes, right?

Since the 16-bit lifetimes can be represented as 32-bit lifetimes, I don't think it's an issue.