Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-00

Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Tue, 06 April 2010 02:39 UTC

Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB653A6819 for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilQhJsNXwtZO for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f217.google.com (mail-gx0-f217.google.com [209.85.217.217]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4DD3A67EC for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so3370353gxk.8 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JHm0aUcRZxuPK56Ot5Ti9FD+93ejrVWYYBVGCSBc/VE=; b=AonaAgQQ2kmThWODOYBe8ebuunZthjprYhXKXI64dTgDHofpB2pFl/zOOow2qOW1ZX oBMW5UT7e4vSQPOrYRgorWcjfgo7vW81rcJyMuYZFlCLlguIl4my7pG+3e9VixPEz/oe Xd9oTfqUykWvTHRv7l2KYBrcNEZq/lh79hwF0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cA+tNEcoStM0EAvt3CEYMpi4u1Yqi7WWEurlhBh6pgw/AuVZgbq5sFYxNePHIPdYT7 Ei7Po29DD5+C1uXuPMjQRhH3LR4FKuV8X/hCIol4GUN3ERB+qHK9QX1vOrdKsRkHcOp+ Wby4ylOBy+LxmE/iCPDVqeCdeEOSsz6jCAAv4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.152.202 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <044f01cad05d$22cdd090$c6f0200a@cisco.com>
References: <AcrQXSIWX7VrtDK7SBKyEB9Yj26v2Q==> <044f01cad05d$22cdd090$c6f0200a@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:39:51 +0800
Received: by 10.101.211.15 with SMTP id n15mr15763644anq.64.1270521591095; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <n2h1d38a3351004051939m78d84b11qe9f58c4228886d2e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, Gabriel Montenegro <gmonte@microsoft.com>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-00
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:39:58 -0000

DNS server always has specific interface related information,
but the final DNS server will still be host based, I wouldn't say it
is not correct.

one example would be you have internet connection and vpn connection
at the same time,
good VPN implementation will always rely on VPN DNS server information
for Internet connection.

-Hui

2010/3/31 Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>:
> Section 3.2.1.3 of describes the DNS configuration of Windows, and says:
>
>  "Interface specific DNS configuration can be input via static
>   configuration or via DHCP.  It includes:
>
>   o  An interface-specific suffix list.
>
>   o  A list of DNS server IP addresses."
>
> It is curious that the first bullet repeats "interface specific", but the
> second bullet does not repeat it.  A reasonable interpretation is that the
> second bullet is not interface-specific, but the lead-in sentence says this is
> interface-specific.  I was hoping draft-montenegro-mif-multihoming-00 would
> clarify, but it doesn't.
>
> -d
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>