Re: [Mip4] RFC 5177 on Network Mobility (NEMO) Extensions for Mobile IPv4

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 24 April 2008 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mip4-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mip4-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mip4-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE0D3A68B8; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mip4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FD83A67A3 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YN7xI4-rlZt9 for <mip4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E6FB43A68B8 for <mip4@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1209031469!17591643!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=.,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.189.100.103]
Received: (qmail 20452 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2008 10:04:29 -0000
Received: from motgate3.mot.com (HELO motgate3.mot.com) (144.189.100.103) by server-12.tower-128.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2008 10:04:29 -0000
Received: from az33exr01.mot.com (az33exr01.mot.com [10.64.251.231]) by motgate3.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id m3OA4Tnf025977; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:04:29 -0700 (MST)
Received: from az10vts01 (az10vts01.mot.com [10.64.251.242]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id m3OA4Sxe012298; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:04:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (zfr01-2117.crm.mot.com [10.161.201.117]) by az33exr01.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id m3OA4QJB012163; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:04:26 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <48105B1F.3030102@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:04:15 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: George Tsirtsis <tsirtsis@googlemail.com>
References: <20080423234721.5C847125D14@bosco.isi.edu> <d3886a520804240252k69507066gb0c652704829bcaf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d3886a520804240252k69507066gb0c652704829bcaf@mail.gmail.com>
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080423-1, 23/04/2008), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: mip4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Mip4] RFC 5177 on Network Mobility (NEMO) Extensions for Mobile IPv4
X-BeenThere: mip4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility for IPv4 <mip4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mip4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4>, <mailto:mip4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mip4-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mip4-bounces@ietf.org

George Tsirtsis wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Now that NEMOv4-base is outof the way, how about starting the process
> for http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mip4-nemov4-fa-02 ?

Not sure whether you request procedural advancement or technical discussion.

Technically, I think there's need of some more syncing on FA-NEMO docs, 
eg citing numbers already allocated, ordering between different mobile 
network extensions, and maybe other things.  The Sec section could say 
how new risks are introduced by th etunnelling extension and how 
protection is offered.  3.1 background could picture a figure or two of 
tunnels.  Just some thoughts...

Alex

> 
> 
> Regards
> George
> 
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:47 AM,  <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
>>  A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>>
>>
>>         RFC 5177
>>
>>         Title:      Network Mobility (NEMO) Extensions for
>>                     Mobile IPv4
>>         Author:     K. Leung, G. Dommety,
>>                     V. Narayanan, A. Petrescu
>>         Status:     Standards Track
>>         Date:       April 2008
>>         Mailbox:    kleung@cisco.com,
>>                     gdommety@cisco.com,
>>                     vidyan@qualcomm.com,
>>                     alexandru.petrescu@motorola.com
>>         Pages:      26
>>         Characters: 56094
>>         Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>>
>>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-mip4-nemo-v4-base-11.txt
>>
>>         URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5177.txt
>>
>>  This document describes a protocol for supporting Mobile Networks
>>  between a Mobile Router and a Home Agent by extending the Mobile IPv4
>>  protocol.  A Mobile Router is responsible for the mobility of one or
>>  more network segments or subnets moving together.  The Mobile Router
>>  hides its mobility from the nodes on the Mobile Network.  The nodes
>>  on the Mobile Network may be fixed in relationship to the Mobile
>>  Router and may not have any mobility function.
>>
>>  Extensions to Mobile IPv4 are introduced to support Mobile Networks.
>>  [STANDARDS TRACK]
>>
>>  This document is a product of the Mobility for IPv4 Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>>  This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol.
>>
>>  STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track
>>  protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions
>>  for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Internet
>>  Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and
>>  status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>>
>>  This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
>>  Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
>>  should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG.  Requests to be
>>  added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
>>  be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.
>>
>>  Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
>>  an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body
>>
>>  help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
>>
>>         To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG
>>         Subject: getting rfcs
>>
>>         help: ways_to_get_rfcs
>>
>>  Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
>>  author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Unless
>>  specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
>>  unlimited distribution.
>>
>>  Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
>>  RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG.  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC
>>  Authors, for further information.
>>
>>
>>  The RFC Editor Team
>>  USC/Information Sciences Institute
>>
>>  ...
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  IETF-Announce mailing list
>>  IETF-Announce@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
-- 
Mip4 mailing list: Mip4@ietf.org
    Web interface: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip4
     Charter page: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/mip4-charter.html
Supplemental site: http://www.mip4.org/