IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 111

"dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com> Mon, 23 February 2009 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119213A6AFD for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.235, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKmdBY0Qv98E for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com (outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com [64.136.55.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 47C0B3A67DD for <mmox@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:22 -0800 (PST)
X-UOL-TAGLINE: true
Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (webmail16.vgs.untd.com [10.181.12.156]) by smtpout03.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABE4F2BWAAJ2H22 for <mmox@ietf.org> (sender <dyerbrookme@juno.com>); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:16 -0800 (PST)
X-UNTD-OriginStamp: ireJTaFtV8IZgEqY8qAucSk4DgBsdYkNcuwRU7BexcFIk0/5VgLx5g==
Received: (from dyerbrookme@juno.com) by webmail16.vgs.untd.com (jqueuemail) id N94SSTEK; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:43:11 PST
Received: from [68.161.198.3] by webmail16.vgs.untd.com with HTTP: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:42:15 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [68.161.198.3]
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "dyerbrookme@juno.com" <dyerbrookme@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:42:15 +0000
To: dcolivares@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0
Message-Id: <20090223.124215.6321.0@webmail16.vgs.untd.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-ContentStamp: 2:1:411459876
X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.12.156|webmail16.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|dyerbrookme@juno.com
Cc: mmox@ietf.org, dyerbrookme@juno.com
Subject: Re: [mmox] mmox Digest, Vol 1, Issue 111
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:43:23 -0000

Fisking and Nizkorisms may be tactics used on MMORPG forums and the IRC channel,  but in the real world when somebody poisons the well, it's poisoned, whether or not the logical positivists believe it to be true, and alerting a group project of the "poison" is beneficial, not rhetorically fallacious. Yes, there must be a mandate to protect content, or the false hypothesis that everyone then has choice when it isn't mandated will hold true -- speaking of false hypotheses. Those who don't want c/m/t can either not connect, or check off c/m/t on full perms.

I'm glad we've established that OpenSim is Leninist, though, that's progress : )

Prokofy Neva


____________________________________________________________
30 Seconds can save a lifetime. Get it done. Its never been easier.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTQcxKVpPVsInGwV4kaJM21nNhUM1Ho63hKvtROqoeuXuyQpNFBW8Y/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email