Re: [MMUSIC] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-content-04.txt

On 24 Aug 2006, at 10:36, Arnoud van Wijk wrote:
> I agree with Gunnar and disagree with you.
> The txp content label is no different the the other content labels  
> IMHO.
> And again, it is NOT about a PSTN textphone, but about turntaking  
> be used in the call since it media stream contains real-time text  
> to be used in turn taking method.

You are again missing the point: "real-time text to be used in turn  
taking method" says nothing about the contents of the stream, but  
rather describes how the users should interact with each other.  
That's a reasonable thing to describe, but it isn't describing the  
contents, and so shouldn't be in this attribute.

> It is not about a special phone, or limited device that is elsewise  
> unable to be connected.

The submitted versions of the draft, and the draft of V.151 Annex D  
that has been circulated, contradict that. Both use this parameter to  
signal that the peer device has limited user interface capabilities,  
which may change the way in which users interact during the session.

> But I am still waiting on Gonzalo's view on this.

Indeed - I would also like to hear other views.

Colin

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic