Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

"Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com> Tue, 10 July 2012 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <skraza@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C6911E809A for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLaPMVxrBSiA for <mpls-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C35421F8790 for <mpls-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:13:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1662; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1341947649; x=1343157249; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=yNdkGdlqULGbzrJejO+zphqpfstXHbOBj8YvGRUnqhg=; b=XNjeHCuq4OaikTOzbaqeRQ+e6R/8hPkFEdM971skDh40m+aHNf7ZizFf Gy9mZh2XUGBizcrAgappin+7iObQuTZqyeVn4Ut5T7iuCPn1RHw2T6gmz Q0Ina+Lz6tV2iCRiStYh7dFmb0To9Jleqry7beI6sxEL3WOepYRdoh+Fi E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EACd+/E+tJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFt32BB4IgAQEBBAEBAQ8BWwsSAQgOClULJQEBBAENBSKHawucfKAuBItAhiIDiBaNII4fgWaCX4Ff
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,561,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="97545554"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2012 19:14:03 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6AJE1nP005464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:14:01 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com ([169.254.6.20]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:14:01 -0500
From: "Kamran Raza (skraza)" <skraza@cisco.com>
To: Nischal Sheth <nsheth@juniper.net>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv
Thread-Index: Ac1O7viHN2hrb6y1R2mvf0ff4lr/LgPZxWMAACCedoA=
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:14:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CC21F6FF.F58C%skraza@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FFB6BCC.5030006@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.185]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19032.001
x-tm-as-result: No--33.672600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1E7553FBE384434F89500F7A3C2DB543@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:58:18 -0700
Cc: "George Swallow \(swallow\)" <swallow@cisco.com>, Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>, "mpls-review@ietf.org" <mpls-review@ietf.org>, "Luca Martini \(lmartini\)" <lmartini@cisco.com>, "Sami Boutros \(sboutros\)" <sboutros@cisco.com>, Nic Leymann <N.Leymann@telekom.de>, "thomas.morin@orange.com" <thomas.morin@orange.com>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Subject: Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv
X-BeenThere: mpls-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS Review <mpls-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-review>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review>, <mailto:mpls-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:13:41 -0000

Hi Nischal,

Thanks a lot for your review.

I'll address your comment in the next rev shortly.

Rgds.

-- Kamran

On 12-07-09 7:39 PM, "Nischal Sheth" <nsheth@juniper.net> wrote:

>
>Hi All,
>
>Having read and reviewed draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02,
>I think it is well-written and addresses a practical problem encountered
>in LDP deployments. I believe it's ready for adoption as a WG document.
>
>I agree with previous comments that new LDP applications MUST state the
>applicability of the negotiated label advertisement discipline.
>
>-Nischal
>
>On 6/20/2012 7:14 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
>> You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
>> draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
>> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
>> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
>> the document technically sound? We are interested in knowing whether the
>> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn¹t have
>>to
>> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).
>> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and
>>secretary,
>> and CC¹d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent
>> privately to only the WG chairs.
>> Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you
>>an
>> extra week due to the July 4th holiday)?
>> Thanks, Ross
>> (as MPLS WG chair)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mpls-review mailing list
>> Mpls-review@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review
>
>