Re: [Mpls-review] MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

Hi Nischal,

Thanks a lot for your review.

I'll address your comment in the next rev shortly.

Rgds.

-- Kamran

On 12-07-09 7:39 PM, "Nischal Sheth" <nsheth@juniper.net> wrote:

>
>Hi All,
>
>Having read and reviewed draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02,
>I think it is well-written and addresses a practical problem encountered
>in LDP deployments. I believe it's ready for adoption as a WG document.
>
>I agree with previous comments that new LDP applications MUST state the
>applicability of the negotiated label advertisement discipline.
>
>-Nischal
>
>On 6/20/2012 7:14 AM, Ross Callon wrote:
>> You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
>> draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
>> Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
>> (ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
>> the document technically sound? We are interested in knowing whether the
>> document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn¹t have
>>to
>> be perfect at this point, but should be a good start).
>> Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and
>>secretary,
>> and CC¹d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent
>> privately to only the WG chairs.
>> Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you
>>an
>> extra week due to the July 4th holiday)?
>> Thanks, Ross
>> (as MPLS WG chair)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mpls-review mailing list
>> Mpls-review@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-review
>
>