[Mpls-review] 答复: MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

[Mach Chen <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I have read and reviewed draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02. 

Overall, I think this draft is useful and ready to be considered for WG adoption.

I also have some comments on the draft:

1. Section 4.1, 
"Any document specifying a new FEC SHOULD state the applicability
     of the negotiated label advertisement discipline for that FEC."
I agree with Luca, a "MUST" (instead of "SHOULD") should be more appropriate.

2. Section 5
It's not clear the "future work" is of this draft or the WG(I guess its later), especially for the first paragraph, it gave me the impression that this draft will define per-FEC/application capability negotiation in the future. And the second paragraph is a bit overlap with Section 4.1.  So, I'd suggest to remove this section. If want to keep it, you could just keep the first paragraph and clarify the new extension is out of scope. 

Best regards,
Mach

发件人: Ross Callon [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2012年6月20日 22:14
收件人: Nischal Sheth; Mach Chen; [e-mail]
抄送: Loa Andersson; George Swallow; Ross Callon; Martin Vigoureux; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Sami Boutros (sboutros); Luca Martini; Nic Leymann
主题: MPLS-RT review of draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv

You have been selected as an MPLS Review team reviewers for
draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.
 
Reviews should comment on whether the document is coherent, is it useful
(ie, is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks), and is
the document technically sound?  We are interested in knowing whether the 
document is ready to be considered for WG adoption (ie, it doesn’t have to
be perfect at this point, but should be a good start). 
 
Reviews should be sent to the document authors, WG co-chairs and secretary,
and CC’d to the MPLS WG email list. If necessary, comments may be sent 
privately to only the WG chairs. 
 
Are you able to review this draft by July 11, 2012 (this is giving you an 
extra week due to the July 4th holiday)? 
 
Thanks, Ross
(as MPLS WG chair)