Re: [mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll on draft-song-mpls-extension-header

Hi Tarek, WG,

I do not support the wg adoption of this draft as I find the terms of the
IPR disclosed too restrictive for the wider deployment.

Thanks,
Rakesh

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023, 12:27 p.m. Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
>
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-song-mpls-extension-header as a MPLS working group document.
>
>
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working group
> mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical motivation for your
> support/not support, especially if you think that the document should not
> be adopted as a working group document.
>
>
>
> There is 1 IPR disclosure against this document.
>
>    -- 5827 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5827/> from Huawei
>
>
>
> All the authors/contributors have stated on the MPLS WG mailing list that
> they are unaware of any undisclosed IPRs that relates to this document.
>
>
>
> Since we have had some concerns about IPR, we like to remind you that the
> working group does not discuss the validity and applicability of an IPR,
> however it is assumed that all respondents to the wgap have looked at the
> IPR disclosures and, if they approve of the adoption, are comfortable with
> the IPRs as disclosed.
>
>
>
> The working group adoption poll ends February 24, 2023.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tarek (as MPLS WG Co-chair)
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>