IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 11 February 2017 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416BC129A1D; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:40:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MGTWeb5GeAjN; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6373F129A18; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3220; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486834816; x=1488044416; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Q9ZFjM8AuwbV2j7D0roR0hdfjH7qzpGZ13zTvXIa6C4=; b=EYjrYTaADFNqIRfTTMafl7Uivol5a3Ibmv9vuYvEniE8YOi0PktbtJkm sHebrUCDWdYrUoXR+dq8B2TKadhKmgbbn1x3so4qfIdU0d7mBL47S76t5 gXwSW2ChpvffLmoWZt2WKg5ClZ6qxmVycbMN3x7MZXhZe0+RwJz8q2+AO w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ATAQBDTJ9Y/5xdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1JhgQkHjVqSDZU2ggwfDYV2gn0/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGoBAQQBAWkDCw4EAQgYSQwLJwQBDQUJiWEOsguLSQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBASAFizaEJhEBhgEFm3IBkhOBe4UXiXOTFAEfOHgIURU9hkN1AYgIgSGBDAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,147,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="205685124"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2017 17:40:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (xch-rcd-017.cisco.com [173.37.102.27]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1BHeATG014139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 11 Feb 2017 17:40:10 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-RCD-017.cisco.com (173.37.102.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:40:10 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:40:10 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
Thread-Index: AQHShI3kphzjorylQ02VnbUB643jFQ==
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 17:40:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D4C4B5FD.9C23E%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <132A1170871DE944932801B789B13FB9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eBNJWQKSZEn8RHdLkWf-t9BT7no>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] nits and question on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 17:40:18 -0000

Hi Loa, Carlos, 

On 2/11/17, 8:29 AM, "mpls on behalf of Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)"
<mpls-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:

>Hi, Loa,
>
>> On Feb 3, 2017, at 10:54 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>> 
>> Working Group, authors,
>> 
>> I had a quick look at  draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-02, I have a few
>> small nits and questions for the authors.
>> 
>> 1. FEC is a well know abbreviation in MPLS context, but it is not
>>well-know in wider IETF context. It needs to be expanded at first
>> occurrence.
>
>Agreed.
>
>> 
>> 2. We have early allocation for this document, can you place the
>>following not in the IANA section in section 10.1.
>> 
>> "Note to the RFC Editor (please remove before publication): IANA has
>> made early allocation for sub-type 34, 35 and 35. The early allocation
>> expires 2017-09-15.²
>
>OK.
>
>> 
>> And then we create a "#Protocol" sub-registry in  "Multi-Protocol Label
>> Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters" We will
>>need to define allocation policies and code point range. IMHO the policy
>> should be "Standards Action" and the code range 0-255.
>
>This is OK ‹ I would also reserve a couple of values for Experiments.
>
>> 
>> And a last question, should BGP-LS be in that registry?
>> 
>
>I guess no until someone needs it?

BGP-LS has its own set of registries.

Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters
    		
    		
    		
    			
    			BGP-LS NLRI-Types
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml#
nlri-types>
    			
    			RFC 7752 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc7752>
			
    			
Specification Required (Expert: Unassigned)
    			
    		
    		
    		
    			
    			BGP-LS Node Descriptor, Link Descriptor, Prefix Descriptor, and
Attribute TLVs 
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml#
node-descriptor-link-descriptor-prefix-descriptor-attribute-tlv>
    			
    			RFC 7752 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc7752>
			
    			
Specification Required (Expert: Unassigned)
    			
    		
    		
    		
    			
    			BGP-LS Protocol-IDs
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml#
protocol-ids>
    			
    			RFC 7752 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc7752>
			
    			
Specification Required (Expert: Unassigned)
    			
    		
    		
    		
    			
    			BGP-LS Well-Known Instance-IDs
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-ls-parameters/bgp-ls-parameters.xhtml#
well-known-instance-ids>
    			
    			RFC 7752 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc7752>
			
    			
Specification Required (Expert: Unassigned)


Thanks,
Acee  




>
>Thanks,
>
>‹ Carlos.
>
>> /Loa
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>_______________________________________________
>mpls mailing list
>mpls@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email