IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 31 December 2020 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1583A0AD3; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:51:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Cpim0dCZS8D; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020A23A0AD0; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4D5sxg5vDqz67Q49; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:47:03 +0800 (CST)
Received: from nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) by fraeml739-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 03:51:30 +0100
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.157) by nkgeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.98.57.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:51:28 +0800
Received: from nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) by nkgeml707-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.98.57.157]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.002; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:51:28 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org" <draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04
Thread-Index: AQHW2hyPog2zvWgYuUSVwIHtfEHSC6oLlMwAgABiuYCAApIqAIACAQoQ
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 02:51:28 +0000
Message-ID: <441792f05eec40548dd7c0acb2f75ba0@huawei.com>
References: <CAA=duU21PHQoJP0cEX6o1K=EwUFqeH19YvcDPNJVKE9c2szS6w@mail.gmail.com> <46b1b623-a628-2373-4378-e70f0038b4f2@pi.nu> <AM7PR07MB6248A6E61A831729A24EF720A0D90@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <508b5ef1-6958-ae84-1c81-f0cfe0c054d3@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <508b5ef1-6958-ae84-1c81-f0cfe0c054d3@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.128]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/w3kkpDH8afDo9o_5hk4ZU3ELS4E>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 02:51:35 -0000

I have one concern on the usage of ACH. 
I am not sure if there is any restriction that Ach is only used for active/synthetic packet.

Best,
Tianran
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:13 PM
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS-RT Review of draft-gandhi-mpls-ioam-sr-04

Tom, et.al,

On 28/12/2020 20:56, tom petch wrote:
> However, I'd like to see more discussion on what we should do. In 
> particular I'd like to see a comment from the authors on this.
> 
> <tp>
> 
> Why not use ACH?

I don't think there is anything in the thread the says "don't use ACH", what I want is just to tie up the last lose ends before going to decision.

/Loa
> 
> Tom Petch

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email