Re: [multimob] Comments on draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01.txt

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Wed, 22 October 2008 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <multimob-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: multimob-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-multimob-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2FA3A6A4B; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multimob@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260C23A6A4B for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAU2Qii2NI2t for <multimob@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.rz.fhtw-berlin.de (mail2.rz.fhtw-berlin.de [141.45.10.102]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F073A6861 for <multimob@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Envelope-to: multimob@ietf.org
Received: from e178172212.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.172.212] helo=[192.168.178.20]) by mail2.rz.fhtw-berlin.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>) id 1KslMb-0007vC-Ej; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:35:33 +0200
Message-ID: <48FF9CA5.8060408@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:35:33 +0200
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
References: <510352.29702.qm@web38808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <510352.29702.qm@web38808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Cc: multimob@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multimob] Comments on draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01.txt
X-BeenThere: multimob@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multicast Mobility <multimob.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/multimob>
List-Post: <mailto:multimob@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob>, <mailto:multimob-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
Sender: multimob-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: multimob-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Behcet,

I'm in charge to defend Hui as the figure is from my side.

It is not exactly clear why you state "Figure 2 depicts local routing
as something totally different" ??? -
what is expressed here: a content source local to the PMIP-domain - but 
not local to a particular MAP. And in consequence a (multicast) routing 
  within the PMIP domain without LMA-MAG tunneling. That's what the text 
says, as well.

This has been discussed prior to version 00 on the mailing list ... and 
seems a reasonable approach to me: what is "certainly not correct"?

Regards,

Thomas

Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hello Hui,
>   Thanks for your hard work in coming up with this revised version. I 
> read it.
>   My comment is regarding Section 2. Local routing in PMIP6 as described 
> in Section 6.10.3 of RFC 5213 refers to the routing by the MAG locally 
> without tunneling to the LMA. In 
> draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01 Figure 2 depicts local routing 
> as something totally different. The text you have seems to be OK but the 
> figure is certainly not correct.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
> To: multimob@ietf.org
> Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 11:17:13 AM
> Subject: [multimob] Fwd: I-D 
> Action:draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01.txt
> 
> Hello, all
>  
> We have updated the draft based on the list discussion.
> Please help to review and comment.
>  
> thanks
>  
> -Hui
> 
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
> 
>        Title           : Multicast Support Requirements for Proxy Mobile 
> IPv6
>        Author(s)       : H. Deng, et al.
>        Filename        : draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01.txt
>        Pages           : 14
>        Date            : 2008-10-19
> 
> This document summarizes requirements for multicast listener support
> in Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) scenarios.  In correspondance to
> PMIPv6, multicast mobility management requirements do not request any
> active participation of the mobile node.
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-deng-multimob-pmip6-requirement-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> multimob mailing list
> multimob@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob

-- 

° Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° HAW Hamburg, Dept. Informatik
° University of Applied Sciences
° Berliner Tor 7, D 20099 Hamburg, Germany
° Fon: +49-40-42875-8452, Fax: -8409
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt
_______________________________________________
multimob mailing list
multimob@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multimob