IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis

Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 24 January 2006 19:39 UTC

From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:39:57 -0500
Lines: 70
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20051213190224.02e7c310@ogud.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Tue Jan 24 20:52:47 2006
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
To: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>, namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051213190224.02e7c310@ogud.com>
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20051213190224.02e7c310@ogud.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 66.92.146.160
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418072127.2560.64812.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

Come on can someone please review these simple documents.

In the last 40 days 2 people have spoken up.
Summary of changes from the RFC's is provided in
http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2005/msg01888.html

Unless 3 more people say they have read the documents and
agree with them being forwarded.

An alternative approach is to obsolete DSA RFC2536 and
move DHK 2539 off standards track.

Please be nice to your chairs and either
         read the documents
or      tell chairs you support the alternate plans.

         Olafur

At 19:06 13/12/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote:
>In light of the new WG requirement that every document the working
>group advances there must be a set of WG members on record that they
>have reviewed the documents before the WG chairs can advance the document.
>
>This is a call for 5 members of the WG to read and review each of
>these documents.
>
>         thanks
>         Olafur
>
>At 23:48 17/10/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote:
>
>>This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on
>>November 1, for the two following documents:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt
>>
>>These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and
>>Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and
>>DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types).
>>The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are
>>replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents.
>>
>>These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at
>>proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis.
>>
>>The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any
>>issues with the documents please raise them now.
>>
>>         Olafur & Olaf
>>
>>--
>>to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
>>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email