RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> Wed, 25 January 2006 15:38 UTC
From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>
Subject: RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:38:34 -0500
Lines: 95
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Wed Jan 25 16:55:38 2006
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418072127.2560.62950.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Just a reminder that wdiff's with the previous RFCs are available at http://www.pothole.com/~dee3/. Thanks, Donald -----Original Message----- From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:40 PM To: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair; namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Come on can someone please review these simple documents. In the last 40 days 2 people have spoken up. Summary of changes from the RFC's is provided in http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2005/msg01888.html Unless 3 more people say they have read the documents and agree with them being forwarded. An alternative approach is to obsolete DSA RFC2536 and move DHK 2539 off standards track. Please be nice to your chairs and either read the documents or tell chairs you support the alternate plans. Olafur At 19:06 13/12/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote: >In light of the new WG requirement that every document the working >group advances there must be a set of WG members on record that they >have reviewed the documents before the WG chairs can advance the document. > >This is a call for 5 members of the WG to read and review each of these >documents. > > thanks > Olafur > >At 23:48 17/10/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote: > >>This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on >>November 1, for the two following documents: >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-0 >>6.txt >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-0 >>6.txt >> >>These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and >>Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and >>DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types). >>The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they >>are replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents. >> >>These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at >>proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis. >> >>The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any >>issues with the documents please raise them now. >> >> Olafur & Olaf >> >>-- >>to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org >>with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/> > > >-- >to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with >the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/> > -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/> -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Samuel Weiler
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Scott Rose
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Andrew Sullivan