DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis

Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com> Tue, 18 October 2005 04:48 UTC

From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:48:54 -0400
Lines: 26
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Tue Oct 18 06:57:34 2005
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 on 66.92.146.160
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418072056.2560.98677.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on
November 1, for the two following documents:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt

These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and
Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and
DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types).
The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are
replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents.

These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at
proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis.

The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any
issues with the documents please raise them now.

	Olafur & Olaf 


--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>