RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis

["Scott Rose" <[e-mail]>]

I read the two drafts, and I think they should be progressed.

I found 2 minor typos in the RFC2536bis:

1.  In section 3 last paragraph, SIG is used instead of RRSIG

2.  In section 5, last paragraph, "[random]" is used as the endnote, I
assume it is supposed to be RFC4086 in the references.

Scott
****************************************
Scott Rose
Adv. Network Tech. Div., NIST
[phone]

https://www-x.antd.nist.gov/dnssec/
****************************************

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail]
> [mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Ólafur Guðmundsson
> /DNSEXT co-chair
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 2:40 PM
> To: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
>
>
> Come on can someone please review these simple documents.
>
> In the last 40 days 2 people have spoken up.
> Summary of changes from the RFC's is provided in
> http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2005/msg01888.html
>
> Unless 3 more people say they have read the documents and
> agree with them being forwarded.
>
> An alternative approach is to obsolete DSA RFC2536 and
> move DHK 2539 off standards track.
>
> Please be nice to your chairs and either
>          read the documents
> or      tell chairs you support the alternate plans.
>
>          Olafur
>
> At 19:06 13/12/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote:
> >In light of the new WG requirement that every document the working
> >group advances there must be a set of WG members on record that they
> >have reviewed the documents before the WG chairs can advance the
> document.
> >
> >This is a call for 5 members of the WG to read and review each of
> >these documents.
> >
> >         thanks
> >         Olafur
> >
> >At 23:48 17/10/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote:
> >
> >>This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on
> >>November 1, for the two following documents:
> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis
-dsa-06.txt
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.tx
t
>>
>>These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and
>>Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and
>>DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types).
>>The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are
>>replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents.
>>
>>These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at
>>proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis.
>>
>>The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any
>>issues with the documents please raise them now.
>>
>>         Olafur & Olaf
>>
>>--
>>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to [e-mail] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>