Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 14 December 2005 00:06 UTC
From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair <ogud@ogud.com>
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:06:17 -0500
Lines: 42
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org Wed Dec 14 01:15:02 2005
Return-path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
To: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost>
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051017155946.03fbdd88@localhost>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 66.92.146.160
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418072119.2560.37339.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
In light of the new WG requirement that every document the working group advances there must be a set of WG members on record that they have reviewed the documents before the WG chairs can advance the document. This is a call for 5 members of the WG to read and review each of these documents. thanks Olafur At 23:48 17/10/2005, Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT wrote: >This message starts a 2 week Working Group Last call ending on >November 1, for the two following documents: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2536bis-dsa-06.txt >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2539bis-dhk-06.txt > >These two documents replace older RFC's to reflect the fact DSA and >Diffie-Hellman keying information is encoded the same way in KEY and >DNSKEY RR's (and other DNS RR types). >The documents contain few minor textual changes from the RFC's they are >replacing, including references to the DNSSEC-bis documents. > >These documents are on standards track and will be recycled at >proposed standard, to be at the same level as DNSSEC-bis. > >The default action is to advance these documents, if you find any >issues with the documents please raise them now. > > Olafur & Olaf > >-- >to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with >the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/> -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Samuel Weiler
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Mark Andrews
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT co-chair
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Scott Rose
- RE: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: DNSEXT WGLC: RFC2536bis and RFC2539bis Andrew Sullivan