Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urgent
Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com> Tue, 22 July 2008 07:48 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190773A69A6; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.815
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.815 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.508, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDjKLrpJH6qC; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3623A69CD; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KLCXX-000JOo-4L for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:44:07 +0000
Received: from [2001:4f8:3:bb:230:48ff:fe5a:2f38] (helo=nsa.vix.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <vixie@vix.com>) id 1KLCXT-000JO1-Bf for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:44:05 +0000
Received: from nsa.vix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.vix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D4A1106 for <namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:43:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vixie@nsa.vix.com)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:41:40 +1000." <200807220741.m6M7feDo001635@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <200807220741.m6M7feDo001635@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nil; GNU Emacs 22.2.1
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:43:56 +0000
Message-ID: <73285.1216712636@nsa.vix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Vix-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner-ID: 4F6D4A1106.55FAC
X-Vix-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Vix-MailScanner-From: vixie@vix.com
Subject: Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urgent
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>
> > note, i've met several large internet companies recently who refuse to > > deploy EDNS at all, one said their eyeball count dropped by 3% when they > > started honouring EDNS signalling in their DNS responses. > > Was this before or after referrals to the COM servers from > the root started exceeding 512 octets? after. as you know, inability to fit all the glue into 512 bytes is not cause for concern (nor TCP retry.) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>
- increasing DNS message entropy, a solution for NA… Roy Arends
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Joe Abley
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bmanning
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Roy Arends
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Alex Bligh
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Roy Arends
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Alex Bligh
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bert hubert
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Joe Abley
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Roy Arends
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Joe Abley
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Paul Vixie
- there is a leak: message entropy increase urgent bert hubert
- Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urg… Paul Vixie
- Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urg… Mark Andrews
- Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urg… Paul Vixie
- Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urg… bert hubert
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Joe Abley
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Paul Vixie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Masataka Ohta
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Masataka Ohta
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Alex Bligh
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ray.Bellis
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bmanning
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Duane
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ray.Bellis
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bmanning
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bmanning
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Alex Bligh
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… bert hubert
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ray.Bellis
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Antoin Verschuren
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Alex Bligh
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Ben Laurie
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Doug Barton
- Re: increasing DNS message entropy, a solution fo… Tony Finch