IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urgent

Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org> Tue, 22 July 2008 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999903A6994; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.63 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbTHgT715vis; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ED33A6848; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KLCVR-000Io3-AV for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:41:57 +0000
Received: from [2001:470:1f00:820:214:22ff:fed9:fbdc] (helo=drugs.dv.isc.org) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <marka@isc.org>) id 1KLCVJ-000Imz-44 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:41:51 +0000
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6M7feDo001635; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:41:40 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200807220741.m6M7feDo001635@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Paul Vixie <Paul_Vixie@isc.org>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: there is a leak: message entropy increase urgent
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:16:01 GMT." <70844.1216710961@nsa.vix.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:41:40 +1000
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

> note, i've met several large internet companies recently who refuse to
> deploy EDNS at all, one said their eyeball count dropped by 3% when they
> started honouring EDNS signalling in their DNS responses.

	Was this before or after referrals to the COM servers from
	the root started exceeding 512 octets?

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status