[Netext] Keep missing the point .. Re: next steps for netext

[tsirtsis at googlemail.com (George Tsirtsis)]

First of all no one is deploying anything yet :-)

In any case discussion is useful. People also want to deploy NAT66 but
the community is debating vigorously whether the IETF should define
these...in other words just because people want to do something it
does not mean that the IETF has to comply.

George

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Vijay Devarapalli <vijay at wichorus.com> wrote:
> George, Hesham,
>
> I don't see the point in having philosophical discussions on whether
> Mobile IPv6 or Proxy Mobile IPv6 should be used at this point. That ship
> has sailed. What we have as a reality is folks deploying systems with
> inter access technology handovers with PMIPv6 as the mobility management
> protocol. Asking these folks to now use Mobile IPv6 does not help
> anyone, IMHO.
>
> Vijay
>
>