Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option

"Carl Williams" <carlw@mcsr-labs.org> Thu, 11 August 2011 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <carlw@mcsr-labs.org>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B747421F8BA8 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwG+SnIYftrw for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail150c38.carrierzone.com (mail150c38.carrierzone.com [66.175.56.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020ED21F8B56 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authenticated-User: carlw.mcsr-labs.org
Received: from carlwPCstudio ([69.241.25.0]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail150c38.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p7BITUSI010961; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:29:33 +0000
From: Carl Williams <carlw@mcsr-labs.org>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, netext@ietf.org
References: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:29:37 -0400
Message-ID: <003301cc5854$a36df010$ea49d030$@org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHMV6e2nRIxJbBIkkC03uyU0YByhpUX+dGg
Content-Language: en-us
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=JVcfv8PVBzkSbII2sFYrMKLz19MaNQlQHCvFHjSqRjY= c=1 sm=1 a=_1Z_vZwYX2EA:10 a=Gzqcop6RMF0A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=8wjbuZIaoH7ngIPs8+0CXA==:17 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=9qxNCY_qAAAA:8 a=fB8zmgpMq2DwXNBCGBMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=1pxjJC3EenQA:10 a=8wjbuZIaoH7ngIPs8+0CXA==:117
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:29:02 -0000

Questions:

1. Is the solution to offloading specific IPv4 flows from a MAG of
interest to the WG?

Yes   [X]
No    [ ]

2. Should we adopt as WG I-D:
draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt which will serve as
the starting point in specifying the solution?

Yes  [X]
No   [ ] 


-----Original Message-----
From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:52 PM
To: netext@ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as
specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option



At IETF81, the Netext WG discussed the proposal: "IP Traffic Offload
Selector Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6"
<draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt>

Abstract

   This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option
   for carrying IP Offload traffic selectors between a mobile access
   gateway and a local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain.
   Based on the received offload flow selectors from the local mobility
   anchor, a mobile access gateway can enable offload traffic rule on
   the selected IP flows.

Please note that the offloading of traffic from the MAG is limited to
IPv4 flow only using NAT44 functionality.

The general consensus of the room at the IETF81 WG meeting was that
this is a relevant problem and should be solved by the WG. As per the
minutes:
"
11 people think we should solve the problem, 4 think we should not.
"

As per process, the same question is now being asked on the Netext WG
ML before making a decision.

Questions:

1. Is the solution to offloading specific IPv4 flows from a MAG of
interest to the WG?

Yes   [ ]
No    [ ]

2. Should we adopt as WG I-D:
draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt which will serve as
the starting point in specifying the solution?

Yes  [ ]
No   [ ]

Please respond to the above questions by August 18, 2011 on the ML.

-Chairs

The slides presented at the meeting are available in the IETF81
proceedings. Minutes have been posted to the ML and are also available
at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt


_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext