IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option

<pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 07:15 UTC

Return-Path: <pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDFA11E8077 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bl2VBKV0Xdv9 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5765011E8070 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B74DB738007; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:16:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2D9738006; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:16:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:15:39 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:15:34 +0200
Message-ID: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C46201D4F20E@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
Thread-Index: AQHMV6e2nRIxJbBIkkC03uyU0YByhpUXPWdA
References: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
From: pierrick.seite@orange-ftgroup.com
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, netext@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2011 07:15:39.0869 (UTC) FILETIME=[797CB8D0:01CC57F6]
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 07:15:11 -0000

1: yes
2: yes

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part
> de Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
> Envoyé : mercredi 10 août 2011 23:52
> À : netext@ietf.org
> Objet : [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature
> as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
> 
> 
> 
> At IETF81, the Netext WG discussed the proposal: "IP Traffic Offload
> Selector Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6"
> <draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt>
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option
>    for carrying IP Offload traffic selectors between a mobile access
>    gateway and a local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain.
>    Based on the received offload flow selectors from the local mobility
>    anchor, a mobile access gateway can enable offload traffic rule on
>    the selected IP flows.
> 
> Please note that the offloading of traffic from the MAG is limited to
> IPv4 flow only using NAT44 functionality.
> 
> The general consensus of the room at the IETF81 WG meeting was that
> this is a relevant problem and should be solved by the WG. As per the
> minutes:
> "
> 11 people think we should solve the problem, 4 think we should not.
> "
> 
> As per process, the same question is now being asked on the Netext WG
> ML before making a decision.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1. Is the solution to offloading specific IPv4 flows from a MAG of
> interest to the WG?
> 
> Yes   [x]
> No    [ ]
> 
> 2. Should we adopt as WG I-D:
> draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt which will serve as
> the starting point in specifying the solution?
> 
> Yes  [x]
> No   [ ]
> 
> Please respond to the above questions by August 18, 2011 on the ML.
> 
> -Chairs
> 
> The slides presented at the meeting are available in the IETF81
> proceedings. Minutes have been posted to the ML and are also available
> at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email