Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 07:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2958E1329B5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eifpbc3AkLm8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E07D126BF3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 00:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1766; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1508570938; x=1509780538; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HvBvaCIDQDN3B+Qd2gGuY2/mj5OxVuM6nboix8EOrgA=; b=ZGB6X9zUqSk6npntJs4xPo6Msc+o37GIdD4BeluTMTIXyqId9g5ZdtPU mQCESLZWkVvKhakFt7GiHSDYCu1oOaMEAbibM18hDZyJtQ+FIH9KwXjJB E7CTLFX1zS72WnKglhttDXW/bptJXrVdfHRgEMMUkq3RRio4A3XAH3rFu I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0COAAC89upZ/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhENuJ4N6ih90kBeWaBCCAQojhRgChHoYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFHgY?= =?us-ascii?q?jFUEQCxoCJgICVwcMBgIBAYocEKtAgieLJAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBIYEPg?= =?us-ascii?q?h+DV4FpKYMBgTyDEYNMgmEFih4ViQiOKJRzghWFeoNdhzWOGIQ+gyWBOR84gVs?= =?us-ascii?q?0IQgdFR8qgmQJgl+BeT42h1IsghYBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,409,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="656488660"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2017 07:28:56 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9L7StV1025181; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:28:56 GMT
To: mbj@tail-f.com, warren@kumari.net, kwatsen@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net
Cc: andy@yumaworks.com, netmod@ietf.org
References: <20171016190431.5FA26B80E0F@rfc-editor.org>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <67172aec-686f-90ba-0fc8-1ce2bc3dcdb4@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:28:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20171016190431.5FA26B80E0F@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/1m3ULN6fwyf4ppIjIqSVaT4Q3U0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 07:29:00 -0000

Dear all,

Shall I validate this one?

Regards, Benoit
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950,
> "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5157
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
>
> Section: 14
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP quoted-string
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    key-predicate-expr  = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP
>          (quoted-string / integer-value / decimal-value)
>
> Notes
> -----
> An instance identifier is forced to specify every key value to be a string
> even though the YANG key leaf type could be a numeric type.
> XPath does not require a quoted string here, just YANG.
>
> Old:  /top/list[idx="4"]
> New: /top/list[idx=4]
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language
> Publication Date    : August 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Bjorklund, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : NETCONF Data Modeling Language
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> .
>