Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 23 February 2018 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679E0124D6C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:36:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PRiynB6MBgj for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5730E12025C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 06:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CMOut01 (unknown [10.0.90.82]) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A6A215E73 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:55 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id EEcs1x00C2SSUrH01EcvrX; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:55 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=ft6sXBwf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Op4juWPpsa0A:10 a=I-qAevugAchz5BOPSqUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Xu39Sg/MESEwOU8nfZZgNb79BuKWwFwho1qOfSlQY5g=; b=R41DrA/XyPWTDSdaDyJ5U4EFj5 kwryx2SUidyEyOBdgGZenoBuZWvFP1BxEY2XqNfIsEDUjAh1EBRjuQW3Ymw6PAo8oKGwjKPztEVQM 3kfIU6fJxzLGmkfyTK/e1UTxR;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:38049 helo=[192.168.2.236]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1epESx-002wot-Vl; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:36:52 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, <netmod@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:36:50 -0500
Message-ID: <161c3185fd0.27d3.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <8760c49e-1304-0d55-6e38-004dfaca570c@cisco.com>
References: <195c3186-25ce-3019-1eda-34096fbc8de3@cisco.com> <20180223.103628.1174590223555999274.mbj@tail-f.com> <61afc424-4131-2871-b752-59c086dd4727@labn.net> <20180223.135509.1022283362077802966.mbj@tail-f.com> <d95dfc69-8a84-840f-8dd4-ee3b38bfbdd3@labn.net> <8760c49e-1304-0d55-6e38-004dfaca570c@cisco.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.13.2-730 (build: 101300200)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Exim-ID: 1epESx-002wot-Vl
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.2.236]) [100.15.86.101]:38049
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/3MY5EOcGsm4xBPBbv8hUeV9QOIc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal for minimalist full NMDA support in schema mount
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:36:57 -0000

Rob,

I think we're going in circles here. We have one camp that wants to replace 
the current module with pre 09 and is unwilling to discuss compromise, and 
another camp that wants 08 published as is and has been waiting for the 
working group and authors to submit aversion to the IESG for publication 
based on the last call that completed in November.

The mail I sent that started this thread was sent with the hope of finding 
a compromise. As you and Martin seem uninterested in discussing a 
compromise, I not sure if it's worth pursuing this thread. If I have 
misread your mails, and you are open to compromise then we should continue 
this thread.

If not and there is no interest in finding a compromise in the working 
group and by the authors, I guess we're back to the plan of publishing 08 
and looking forward to protests.

Lou