Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Mon, 27 February 2023 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BE9C16B5BF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0WBRu6BwLXs for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3D36C14CE54 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CA9424FFE7; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiTFyDBWtc4y; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 600E5424F0C0; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230118150200.47D905DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:03:55 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, sagarwal12@gmail.com, huangyi_99@yahoo.com, dana@blairhome.com, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84E74326-96AE-473D-84CF-A499F245E4A1@amsl.com>
References: <20230118150200.47D905DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/4jToWkCX0Wp6jbGFLH9bOtKEPdA>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:04:00 -0000

Greetings Rob,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Jan 18, 2023, at 7:02 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
> "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> 
> Section: A.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl.  In
>   this example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/
>   ietf-acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol-
>   payload-choice and metadata.  The protocol-payload-choice uses a
>   grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values.
>   Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are
>   not in the packet header, such as overall packet length.  In another
>   example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/
>   ietf-acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl.  In
>   this example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches
>   are augmented with two new choices: protocol-payload-choice and
>   metadata.  The protocol-payload-choice uses a
>   grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values.
>   Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are
>   not in the packet header, such as overall packet length.  In another
>   example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:actions 
>   are augmented with a new choice of actions.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The prefix is "acl" not "ietf-acl"
> 
> ==
> module ietf-access-control-list {
>  yang-version 1.1;
>  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list";
>  prefix acl;
>  ...
> ==
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>