Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7312)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Mon, 27 February 2023 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC4CC16B5D2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxmUJmkRPxZR for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD2DC16B5D6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E6E424FFE7; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vD3YrHjsnRYO; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98C5A424F0C0; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230118142922.6EA655DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 15:15:41 -0800
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, sagarwal12@gmail.com, huangyi_99@yahoo.com, dana@blairhome.com, netmod@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AD84AB9B-7812-4C45-9C7E-0F4678CA9431@amsl.com>
References: <20230118142922.6EA655DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IYyyM8uiiX_t4eqzeX-do05WhXU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7312)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 23:15:47 -0000

Greetings Rob,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7312

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On Jan 18, 2023, at 6:29 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
> "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7312
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> 
> Section: A.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   The "example-newco-acl" module is an example of a company's
>   proprietary model that augments the "ietf-acl" module.  It shows how
>   to use 'augment' with an XML Path Language (XPath) expression to add
>   additional match criteria, actions, and default actions for when no
>   ACE matches are found.  All these are company proprietary extensions
>   or system feature extensions.  "example-newco-acl" is just an
>   example, and it is expected that vendors will create their own
>   proprietary models.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   The "example-newco-acl" module is an example of a company's
>   proprietary model that augments the "ietf-access-control-list" module.  It shows how
>   to use 'augment' with an XML Path Language (XPath) expression to add
>   additional match criteria, actions, and default actions for when no
>   ACE matches are found.  All these are company proprietary extensions
>   or system feature extensions.  "example-newco-acl" is just an
>   example, and it is expected that vendors will create their own
>   proprietary models.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> There is no "ietf-acl" module in the document.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network Modeling
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>