[netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 18 January 2023 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD29FC14CF15 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CY3S3SeyZltc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B887C151549 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 47D905DC927; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, sagarwal12@gmail.com, huangyi_99@yahoo.com, dana@blairhome.com, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230118150200.47D905DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bdKW15uylkZe0VXKOslyFaKD_6o>
Subject: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:02:52 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519, "YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Section: A.1 Original Text ------------- The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In this example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ ietf-acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol- payload-choice and metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/ ietf-acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions. Corrected Text -------------- The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl. In this example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol-payload-choice and metadata. The protocol-payload-choice uses a grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values. Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are not in the packet header, such as overall packet length. In another example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions. Notes ----- The prefix is "acl" not "ietf-acl" == module ietf-access-control-list { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"; prefix acl; ... == Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21) -------------------------------------- Title : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs) Publication Date : March 2019 Author(s) : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (731… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Eliot Lear
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Mahesh Jethanandani
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 … Chris Smiley