[netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 18 January 2023 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD29FC14CF15 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CY3S3SeyZltc for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B887C151549 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 47D905DC927; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, mjethanandani@gmail.com, sagarwal12@gmail.com, huangyi_99@yahoo.com, dana@blairhome.com, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230118150200.47D905DC927@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:02:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/bdKW15uylkZe0VXKOslyFaKD_6o>
Subject: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8519 (7313)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:02:52 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7313

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>

Section: A.1

Original Text
-------------
   The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl.  In
   this example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/
   ietf-acl:matches are augmented with two new choices: protocol-
   payload-choice and metadata.  The protocol-payload-choice uses a
   grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values.
   Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are
   not in the packet header, such as overall packet length.  In another
   example, /ietf-acl:acls/ietf-acl:acl/ietf-acl:aces/ietf-acl:ace/
   ietf-acl:actions are augmented with a new choice of actions.

Corrected Text
--------------
   The following figure is the tree diagram of example-newco-acl.  In
   this example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:matches
   are augmented with two new choices: protocol-payload-choice and
   metadata.  The protocol-payload-choice uses a
   grouping with an enumeration of all supported protocol values.
   Metadata matches apply to fields associated with the packet, that are
   not in the packet header, such as overall packet length.  In another
   example, /acl:acls/acl:acl/acl:aces/acl:ace/acl:actions 
   are augmented with a new choice of actions.

Notes
-----
The prefix is "acl" not "ietf-acl"

==
module ietf-access-control-list {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list";
  prefix acl;
  ...
==

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8519 (draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-21)
--------------------------------------
Title               : YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)
Publication Date    : March 2019
Author(s)           : M. Jethanandani, S. Agarwal, L. Huang, D. Blair
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG