Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

[Jürgen Schönwälder <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 12:12:36PM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote:
> Jürgen Schönwälder <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Martin Björklund wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > You didn't answer my first question about what we actually mean - do
> > > we mean the "URI"
> > 
> >         "The uri type represents a Uniform Resource Identifier
> >          (URI) as defined by STD 66. [...]"
> > 
> > STD 66 resolves to RFC 3986. Maybe I do not understand your question.
> 
> RFC 3986 defines the syntax for "URI" and "URI-reference", see
> specifically section 4 and 4.1 of RFC 3986.  To avoid confusion, I
> suggest:
> 
>      "The uri type represents a Uniform Resource Identifier
>       (URI) as defined by the rule 'URI' in RFC 3986.
> 
> or "the ABNF rule 'URI'..."

OK
 
> (side note, is it better to refer to STD 66 rather than the RFC?)

I have no idea. Since this is the only usage of STD in the document
(ignoring the references), I am fine to replace it with an RFC
reference. (The description has been "inherited" from the Uri TC
description in RFC 5017 and it used STD 66.)

/js

-- 
Jürgen Schönwälder              Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>