Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Great news.

Thanks,
Chris.

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> writes:

> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion 
> of WGLC on Nov 6th.
>
> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments 
> are address unless significant faults are found.  Post LC 
> comments have been made, which needed consideration, notably the 
> relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and an alternate 
> representation of inline schema.  These have been considered 
> respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the 
> position of the chairs that it is best to advance the existing 
> schema-mount document at this time.
>
> Given that there are significant concerns for how the solution 
> proposed in this draft operates with NMDA, we do think it 
> reasonable to add an applicability statement to the draft that 
> covers its operation in NMDA implementations. We do not believe 
> that such a statement substantively alters the draft nor would 
> it impact drafts that normatively reference the current draft.
>
> In addition to resolving the remaining open thread [1], we also 
> agree with the recently made comment that the schema mount draft 
> should allow the use of rfc7895bis (i.e., not reference 
> /modules-state), thereby enabling the draft's use (though not 
> ideal) on servers supporting rfc7895bis.
>
> The chairs will propose specific text for the updates mentioned 
> in this message to be reviewed by the WG for correctness before 
> final submission and advancement.
>
> [1] 
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg20049.html
>
> Thanks,
> Kent, Lou, and Joel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod