[netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Mon, 22 January 2018 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5DE127136 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:06:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldMqn0Gvq92u for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:06:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5201D12AF84 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0MK4dks031601 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:05:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=8GB88RWGS6GQjDX5fhj/Y2ksjY6W/b1CPPrZEU5LGPo=; b=avcbSe80eqalJ0OSFJbaUiRrR7GNUWJFElZcBwxvNFOqPOXFE8eQiHD19E4Vv9mhoQCt xIZKf1GH1tHOb9jkayeMNk2tIa/MYu+IrPyzL+XUbdvyKhK8YpK2y13YngwW5KPvQDjN U+7qYdkmDQ2qXXvj6gOUv4tXT6SsGfHS8Bm0y/uFKNZ6iBsTLQfUUBeaezfNmiFvEade mRodBpgFKJT9YUEzKTVyoscclP13wQybV/zi4HHKnpS5z0BYlpCb6MmReDlk7iQZtELt s+iOQBpc/HfTAj3VovV7Ty+8YjGx4K0oM8FV5l6Xu5gOUXolWSLUqoz3ZZVIvOxBeDj6 WA==
Received: from nam03-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03lp0019.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.181.19]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2fnpfp80vq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:05:56 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3113.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.444.5; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:05:53 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) with mapi id 15.20.0444.008; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:05:54 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: moving forward with schema mount
Thread-Index: AQHTk7xos3ciVL7Jy0SyClhY/I/+rA==
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:05:54 +0000
Message-ID: <BF9C1543-4471-4CB3-9A26-451F45A2E4B6@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.11]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3113; 7:5ubEXFhqsyHIL+GFT66k/dVz+Z5FKp6n8bSrGEA14WYfiJIw9F2L60DUxsecq1wCRRvBTaqxZwyAIlgDhhdPWvN5N5ETu1zFRFNYBhDVAnIfS3vqbzERa3QK+qN7p6LB9QCq2oiQ4M+I0sgn3RYROOEtgjIiLHuBbrj61wJqlAgK4XLiABGgXHkVUh7aiNyTHJnVpiPXcuraSPNjVtkVyc989H4VjZ8TjghxT8uUk2gYCSeNy0kDg8TGWXmZ6j+O
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5efc5664-a919-4365-1789-08d561d38b0e
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534125)(4602075)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3113:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3113E75773FA59EC67382F4EA5EC0@DM5PR05MB3113.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3231023)(2400081)(944501161)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113;
x-forefront-prvs: 0560A2214D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(39380400002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(6436002)(97736004)(86362001)(53936002)(33656002)(478600001)(6306002)(5640700003)(2906002)(6916009)(6512007)(3846002)(6116002)(966005)(5660300001)(14454004)(6486002)(83716003)(2501003)(36756003)(2900100001)(66066001)(81166006)(1730700003)(105586002)(8676002)(81156014)(102836004)(59450400001)(316002)(8936002)(68736007)(83506002)(6506007)(106356001)(305945005)(99286004)(7736002)(58126008)(82746002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(2351001)(26005)(77096007)(25786009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3113; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: J43LusMe8Osq+Bw0DC20BwDrCca48+Ga5JNMfWSeLER6pAV24XTqTsSi2nRApPZzItL5Pz9igIJb/gOnKumIJA==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <10FC747D57D3F74E89D472C82E18D833@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5efc5664-a919-4365-1789-08d561d38b0e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jan 2018 20:05:54.0493 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3113
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-22_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801220274
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/5KDLRebz9dK4-IgepuevcnhwKbA>
Subject: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:06:05 -0000

Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on Nov 6th.

Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address unless significant faults are found.  Post LC comments have been made, which needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA and rfc7895bis and an alternate representation of inline schema.  These have been considered respecting their impact on the last call consensus and it is the position of the chairs that it is best to advance the existing schema-mount document at this time.

Given that there are significant concerns for how the solution proposed in this draft operates with NMDA, we do think it reasonable to add an applicability statement to the draft that covers its operation in NMDA implementations. We do not believe that such a statement substantively alters the draft nor would it impact drafts that normatively reference the current draft.

In addition to resolving the remaining open thread [1], we also agree with the recently made comment that the schema mount draft should allow the use of rfc7895bis (i.e., not reference /modules-state), thereby enabling the draft's use (though not ideal) on servers supporting rfc7895bis.

The chairs will propose specific text for the updates mentioned in this message to be reviewed by the WG for correctness before final submission and advancement. 

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg20049.html

Thanks,
Kent, Lou, and Joel